> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 19:26, Sturla Molden wrote:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/msg/dc9ad178113a30fd
>
> It looks like it has a little bit more peer review to get through, but
> thanks for the pointer! That's probably the best motivation I've seen
> to do the refactoring of the n
On 7/29/10 1:37 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> (Book of Guido, 7:42)
That's intriguing. Do you happen to have a link to it?
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 19:26, Sturla Molden wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 16:03, Alan G Isaac
>
>> New sampling algorithms aren't invented *all* that often.
>
> No, but it seems George Marsaglia posted a new prng called KISS4691 to
> sci.math last saturday :)
Of course. :-)
> KISS4691 has
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 16:03, Alan G Isaac
> New sampling algorithms aren't invented *all* that often.
No, but it seems George Marsaglia posted a new prng called KISS4691 to
sci.math last saturday :)
KISS4691 has an immense period (larger than 10**45000), and Marsaglia
claims it can produce
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 16:03, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On 7/29/2010 4:37 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> this MATLAB API is deprecated
>
> The old API has been replaced by a constructor that still takes a
> string literal argument to determine the PRNG algorithm.
> See the bottom of
> http://www.mathworks
On 7/29/2010 4:37 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> this MATLAB API is deprecated
The old API has been replaced by a constructor that still takes a
string literal argument to determine the PRNG algorithm.
See the bottom of
http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/math/brt5wsv.html
This approac
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 09:41, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>>
>> Rather than just looking for a new name (e.g., znormal),
>> would it not be better to decide on a syntax for specifying
>> PRNG algorithms? (E.g., MATLAB takes such an
>> approac
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> Rather than just looking for a new name (e.g., znormal),
> would it not be better to decide on a syntax for specifying
> PRNG algorithms? (E.g., MATLAB takes such an
> approach:
> http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/math/br
Rather than just looking for a new name (e.g., znormal),
would it not be better to decide on a syntax for specifying
PRNG algorithms? (E.g., MATLAB takes such an
approach:
http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/math/brt5wsv.html)
Wouldn't this meet the need for replicability with
