On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2010, at 1:42 AM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> > On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Please don't misinterpret my statements to mean that I thi
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Pierre GM wrote:
> In IPython, numpy.ma.compress? gives you the doc, twice (I don't get why).
I don't have a clue either, but it's now tracked at least:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ipython/+bug/521612
Thanks!
f
___
Nu
On Feb 14, 2010, at 1:42 AM, David Goldsmith wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please don't misinterpret my statements to mean that I think this isn't
> > important and/or that you should feel solely re
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please don't misinterpret my statements to mean that I think this isn't
> important and/or that you should feel solely responsible for a fix - I
> sincerely just wanted to uncover
On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
>
>
> Please don't misinterpret my statements to mean that I think this isn't
> important and/or that you should feel solely responsible for a fix - I
> sincerely just wanted to uncover the nature and extent of the problem.
> Unfortunately,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:01 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> > On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
> >
> > > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is
>
On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:01 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
>
> > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is invalid,
> > an instance where its validity is resulting in a
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
>
> > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is
> invalid, an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for
> the function, or an instance in which Sc
On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
> Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is invalid,
> an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for the
> function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not followed?
The methods
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:24 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> >
> > OK, OK, Ok, it's not worth getting into a flame war over. We ask people
> who are going to be working on the docstrings to subscribe to scipy-dev;
> this is not the same thing as being
On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:24 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
>
> OK, OK, Ok, it's not worth getting into a flame war over. We ask people who
> are going to be working on the docstrings to subscribe to scipy-dev; this is
> not the same thing as being an "innocent bystander" asking a question or
> making
OK, OK, Ok, it's not worth getting into a flame war over. We ask people who
are going to be working on the docstrings to subscribe to scipy-dev; this is
not the same thing as being an "innocent bystander" asking a question or
making a comment - I retract the request.
Now, does anyone have anythin
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:58, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:42, wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:26, David Goldsmith
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:42, wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:26, David Goldsmith
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert Kern
wrote:
>
> On Fri,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:42, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:26, David Goldsmith
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:19, David Goldsmith
wrote:
> PS
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:26, David Goldsmith
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:19, David Goldsmith
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > PS: please, if you don't mind, in the future post do
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:26, David Goldsmith wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:19, David Goldsmith
>> wrote:
>>
>> > PS: please, if you don't mind, in the future post docstring "complaints"
>> > at
>> > scipy-dev (numpy-discussion ha
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:19, David Goldsmith
> wrote:
>
> > PS: please, if you don't mind, in the future post docstring "complaints"
> at
> > scipy-dev (numpy-discussion has many more subscribers, many of whom
> probably
> > don't immediat
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:19, David Goldsmith wrote:
> PS: please, if you don't mind, in the future post docstring "complaints" at
> scipy-dev (numpy-discussion has many more subscribers, many of whom probably
> don't immediately care about any particular docstring problem, whereas
> anyone who
2010/2/12 Hans Meine
> On Friday 12 February 2010 13:43:56 Hans Meine wrote:
> > I was just looking for numpy.ma.compressed, but forgot its name.
>
Fixed this one in the Wiki.
> Another strange thing is the docstring of numpy.ma.compress, which appears
> in
> ipython like this:
>
> Type:
On Friday 12 February 2010 13:43:56 Hans Meine wrote:
> I was just looking for numpy.ma.compressed, but forgot its name.
Another strange thing is the docstring of numpy.ma.compress, which appears in
ipython like this:
Type: instance
Base Class: numpy.ma.core._frommethod
[...]
Docst
Hi,
I was just looking for numpy.ma.compressed, but forgot its name. I suggest to
add a pointer/"see also" to numpy.ma.filled at least:
http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.ma.core.filled/
Unfortunately, I forgot the PW of my account (hans_meine), otherwise I'd have
given it a shot.
Ciao,
22 matches
Mail list logo
