Le mercredi 17 février 2010 à 16:21 -0600, Robert Kern a écrit :
> > What about the next step: a variable number of arguments that are
> > 2d-arrays with different shapes ?
>
> - nm: number of arrays
> - ncols : a 1d-array (dimension nm) containing the number of columns
> in each array
> - nrows :
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:55, Fabrice Silva wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 février 2010 à 15:43 -0600, Robert Kern a écrit :
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:29, Fabrice Silva wrote:
>> > I previously coded a fortran function that needs a variable number of
>> > scalar arguments. This number is not known
Le mercredi 17 février 2010 à 15:43 -0600, Robert Kern a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:29, Fabrice Silva wrote:
> > I previously coded a fortran function that needs a variable number of
> > scalar arguments. This number is not known at compile time, but at call
> > time. So I used to pass t
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:29, Fabrice Silva wrote:
> I previously coded a fortran function that needs a variable number of
> scalar arguments. This number is not known at compile time, but at call
> time. So I used to pass them within a vector, passing also the length of
> this vector
>
>
I previously coded a fortran function that needs a variable number of
scalar arguments. This number is not known at compile time, but at call
time. So I used to pass them within a vector, passing also the length of
this vector
subroutine systeme(inc,t,nm,Dinc,sn)
C
C
