Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py functions, docstrings, and epydoc

2008-03-27 Thread Pearu Peterson
On Thu, March 27, 2008 7:20 pm, Tom Loredo wrote: > > Pearu- > >> smll_offset = smll_offset >> exec `smll_offset.__doc__` > > Thanks for the quick and helpful response! I'll give it > a try. I don't grasp why it works, though. I suppose I don't > need to, but... I'm guessing the exec adds stuff

Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py functions, docstrings, and epydoc

2008-03-27 Thread Tom Loredo
Pearu- > smll_offset = smll_offset > exec `smll_offset.__doc__` Thanks for the quick and helpful response! I'll give it a try. I don't grasp why it works, though. I suppose I don't need to, but... I'm guessing the exec adds stuff to the current namespace that isn't there until a fortran objec

Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py functions, docstrings, and epydoc

2008-03-27 Thread Pearu Peterson
Hi, Tom Loredo wrote: > Hi folks- > > Can anyone offer any tips on how I can get epydoc to produce > API documentation for functions in an f2py-produced module? > Currently they get listed in the generated docs as "Variables": > > Variables > psigc = > sigctp = > smll_offset

[Numpy-discussion] f2py functions, docstrings, and epydoc

2008-03-26 Thread Tom Loredo
Hi folks- Can anyone offer any tips on how I can get epydoc to produce API documentation for functions in an f2py-produced module? Currently they get listed in the generated docs as "Variables": Variables psigc = sigctp = smll_offset = Yet each of these objects is cal