Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Are we able to provide an actual patch to Python that implements this?
> If so, then I am.
> Imho the proposal should come with an actual patch, otherwise it's
> difficult to judge it.
Your better off with writing a PEP first. In order to implement the
proposal you've to ma
On Aug 18, 2008, at 6:57 PM, Andrew Dalke wrote:
> ...
>
> BTW, it's *fun* to modify an existing language and
> afterwards it you know a secret - that programming
> languages are just flimsy facades held together by
> a shared hallucination. Like in a dream, change
> things too much or leave gaps
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:57:20AM +0200, Andrew Dalke wrote:
> BTW, it's *fun* to modify an existing language and
> afterwards it you know a secret - that programming
> languages are just flimsy facades held together by
> a shared hallucination. Like in a dream, change
> things too much or leave
On Aug 19, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> [long posting]
>
> Oh h... what have I done ... *g*
*shrug* I write long emails. I've been told that
by several people. It's probably a bad thing.
> The ideas needs a good PEP. You are definitely up to something. You
> also
> came up wit
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Dalke wrote:
>> When would this "with float ... " considered valid?
>
> [long posting]
>
> Oh h... what have I done ... *g*
>
> Slow down, please. For now there are no concrete plans what-so-ever to
> implement th
Andrew Dalke wrote:
> When would this "with float ... " considered valid?
[long posting]
Oh h... what have I done ... *g*
Slow down, please. For now there are no concrete plans what-so-ever to
implement the feature in the near future. Some developers have expressed
their interest in a way to a
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> > Ok, in the current state, you don't know either what's going to
>>> happen. If you write
>>>
>>> In [1]: x/2*3/4
>>>
>>> you have no idea what the r
On Aug 18, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Example syntax (rough idea):
>
type(1.0)
>
with float as from decimal import Decimal
type(1.0)
>
When would this "with float ... " considered valid?
For example, could I define things before asking
for a redefinition?
def
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > Ok, in the current state, you don't know either what's going to
>> happen. If you write
>>
>> In [1]: x/2*3/4
>>
>> you have no idea what the result is going to be, you need to a
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Ok, in the current state, you don't know either what's going to
> happen. If you write
>
> In [1]: x/2*3/4
>
> you have no idea what the result is going to be, you need to analyze
> x.__div__() and start from there. But if you write
>
> In [2]: 1/2*3/4
>
> currently you
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Andrew Dalke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> with Andrew permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
>> discussion is ontopic. :)
>
> Though I want to point out that without specific proposals
> of how the
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> with Andrew permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
> discussion is ontopic. :)
Though I want to point out that without specific proposals
of how the implementation might look, this thread will
not go anywhere as it will be too distan
Hi,
with Andrew's permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
discussion is ontopic. :)
My original question was, that I would like to override 1+1 to return
MyClass(1, 1) or something.
Robert said it would break other libraries and Andrew said this:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Andrew
13 matches
Mail list logo
