Is there any way to move the existing parts of this thread (i.e., not just
future posts, which of course is as simple as posting them there instead)
over to scipy-dev, where it really belongs?
DG
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> to, 2009-10-01 kello 12:19 -0400, Ralf Gom
to, 2009-10-01 kello 12:19 -0400, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
> Sorry to ask again, but it would really be very useful to get those
> docstrings merged for both scipy and numpy.
[clip]
Numpy's new docstrings is are now in SVN too, for the most part. An
amazing amount of work was done during the summe
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote:
> OK, I've checked in the scipy doc improvements:
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/changeset/5954
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/changeset/5955
>
> Thanks again Jarrod!
> Thanks to everyone who contributed! I will merge the numpy docs l
OK, I've checked in the scipy doc improvements:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/changeset/5954
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/changeset/5955
Thanks to everyone who contributed! I will merge the numpy docs later today.
Is there anything else I need to do on the SciPy documentation editor
to indi
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > Sorry to ask again, but it would really be very useful to get those
> > docstrings merged for both scipy and numpy.
>
> I will do this now.
> Jarrod
>
Thanks a lot!
Ralf
___
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Sorry to ask again, but it would really be very useful to get those
> docstrings merged for both scipy and numpy.
I will do this now.
Jarrod
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.o
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm done reviewing all the improved docstrings for NumPy, they can be
>> merged now from the doc editor Patch page. Maybe I'll get around to doing
>> the SciPy ones as
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm done reviewing all the improved docstrings for NumPy, they can be
> merged now from the doc editor Patch page. Maybe I'll get around to doing
> the SciPy ones as well this week, but I can't promise that.
>
Thank you very much, Ra
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm done reviewing all the improved docstrings for NumPy, they can be
> merged now from the doc editor Patch page. Maybe I'll get around to doing
> the SciPy ones as well this week, but I can't promise that.
>
> Actually, scipy was a l
Hi,
I'm done reviewing all the improved docstrings for NumPy, they can be merged
now from the doc editor Patch page. Maybe I'll get around to doing the SciPy
ones as well this week, but I can't promise that.
There are a few docstrings on the Patch page I did not mark "Ok to apply":
1. the generi
10 matches
Mail list logo
