Seems like this was a rookie mistake with code later in the function.
Thanks for suggesting the use of numpy.where, that is a much better
function for the purpose.
Benjamin
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.sci
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:09, Benjamin Deschamps wrote:
> I am getting strange behaviour with the following code:
> Pd = ((numpy.sign(C_02) == 1) * Pd_pos) + ((numpy.sign(C_02) == -1) *
> Pd_neg)
> Ps = ((numpy.sign(C_02) == 1) * Ps_pos) + ((numpy.sign(C_02) == -1) *
> Ps_neg)
> where Pd, Ps, C_02
I am getting strange behaviour with the following code:
Pd = ((numpy.sign(C_02) == 1) * Pd_pos) + ((numpy.sign(C_02) == -1) *
Pd_neg)
Ps = ((numpy.sign(C_02) == 1) * Ps_pos) + ((numpy.sign(C_02) == -1) *
Ps_neg)
where Pd, Ps, C_02, Pd_pos, Pd_neg, Ps_pos and Ps_neg are all Float32
numpy a
