On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:5
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Charles R Harris <
>>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Mar
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Charles R Harris <
>>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wr
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Darren Dale
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Darren Dale
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Feb 22, 20
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
>
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
>>>
On Feb 22, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> D
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 22, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>>
>>> > Darren Dale wrote:
>>> >> Does anyone know why __array_wrap__ is
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>
>> > Darren Dale wrote:
>> >> Does anyone know why __array_wrap__ is not called for subclasses
>> >> during
>> >> arithmetic operatio
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>
> > Darren Dale wrote:
> >> Does anyone know why __array_wrap__ is not called for subclasses
> >> during
> >> arithmetic operations where an iterable like a list or tuple
> >> appears to
> >> t
On Feb 22, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> Darren Dale wrote:
>> Does anyone know why __array_wrap__ is not called for subclasses
>> during
>> arithmetic operations where an iterable like a list or tuple
>> appears to
>> the right of the subclass? When I do "mine*[1,2,3]", array_wrap i
2009/2/23 Eric Firing :
> Darren Dale wrote:
>> Does anyone know why __array_wrap__ is not called for subclasses during
>> arithmetic operations where an iterable like a list or tuple appears to
>> the right of the subclass? When I do "mine*[1,2,3]", array_wrap is not
>> called and I get an ndarray
Darren Dale wrote:
> Does anyone know why __array_wrap__ is not called for subclasses during
> arithmetic operations where an iterable like a list or tuple appears to
> the right of the subclass? When I do "mine*[1,2,3]", array_wrap is not
> called and I get an ndarray instead of a MyArray. "[1,
Does anyone know why __array_wrap__ is not called for subclasses during
arithmetic operations where an iterable like a list or tuple appears to the
right of the subclass? When I do "mine*[1,2,3]", array_wrap is not called
and I get an ndarray instead of a MyArray. "[1,2,3]*mine" is fine, as is
"min
16 matches
Mail list logo