On Jan 27, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>
> I definitely wouldn't advocate magic by default, but I think it
> would be nice to
> be able to get the functionality if one wanted to.
OK. Put on the TODO list.
> There is one problem I
> noticed, however. I found common_type and lib.mintype
Pierre GM wrote:
> [Some background: we're talking about numpy.lib.recfunctions, a set of
> functions to manipulate structured arrays]
>
> Ryan,
> If the two files have the same structure, you can use that fact and
> specify the dtype of the output directly with the dtype parameter of
> mafr
[Some background: we're talking about numpy.lib.recfunctions, a set of
functions to manipulate structured arrays]
Ryan,
If the two files have the same structure, you can use that fact and
specify the dtype of the output directly with the dtype parameter of
mafromtxt. That way, you're sure th
Pierre (or anyone else who cares to chime in),
I'm using stack_arrays to combine data from two different files into a single
array. In one of these files, the data from one entire record comes back
missing, which, thanks to your recent change, ends up having a boolean dtype.
There is actual data
