Some test files have a set_local_path()/restore_path() pair at the
top, and some don't. Is there any reason to be changing sys.path like
this in the test modules? If not, I'll take them out when I see them.
Thanks,
Alan
___
Numpy-discussion mailing
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Some test files have a set_local_path()/restore_path() pair at the
top, and some don't. Is there any reason to be changing sys.path like
this in the test modules? If not, I'll take them out when I see them.
The idea behind set_local_path is that it allows running tests
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Some test files have a set_local_path()/restore_path() pair at the
top, and some don't. Is there any reason to be changing sys.path like
this in the test modules? If not, I'll take them out when I
Hi,
The idea behind set_local_path is that it allows running tests
inside subpackages without the need to rebuild the entire package.
Ah, thanks; I'd forgotten about that. I'll leave them alone, then. I
made a note for myself to make sure it's possible to run tests locally
without doing a
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 09:01, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Some test files have a set_local_path()/restore_path() pair at the
top, and some don't. Is there any reason to be changing sys.path
On Wed, July 2, 2008 8:25 pm, Robert Kern wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 09:01, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Some test files have a set_local_path()/restore_path() pair at the
top, and some
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 13:58, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, July 2, 2008 8:25 pm, Robert Kern wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 09:01, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Some test
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please remove them and adjust the imports. As I've mentioned before,
numpy and scipy can now reliably be built in-place with python
setup.py build_src --inplace build_ext --inplace. This is a more
robust method to test
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 14:34, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please remove them and adjust the imports. As I've mentioned before,
numpy and scipy can now reliably be built in-place with python
setup.py build_src
2008/7/2 Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 14:34, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please remove them and adjust the imports. As I've mentioned before,
numpy and scipy can now reliably be built
10 matches
Mail list logo
