Hi,
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.dtypes.html#specifying-and-constructing-data-types
says "f2" instead of "f1"
Numarray introduced a short-hand notation for specifying the format of
a record as a comma-separated string of basic formats.
...
The generated data-type fields are n
another note:
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.indexing.html#arrays-indexing-rec
should not say "record array" - because recarray a "special" in that
they can even access the named fields via attribute access rather
than using the dictionary-like syntax.
-S.
PS: I guess I should h
>On 8 June 2010 09:46, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.dtypes.html#specifying-and-constructing-data-types
>
> says "f2" instead of "f1"
>
> Numarray introduced a short-hand notation for specifying the format of
> a record as a comma-separated strin
On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> another note:
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.indexing.html#arrays-indexing-rec
> should not say "record array" - because recarray a "special" in that
> they can even access the named fields via attribute access rather
> than
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
>> another note:
>> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.indexing.html#arrays-indexing-rec
>> should not say "record array" - because recarray a "special" in that
>> they can even acce
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 02:19, Pierre GM wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
>> another note:
>> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.indexing.html#arrays-indexing-rec
>> should not say "record array" - because recarray a "special" in that
>> they can even access
