On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Jay Bourque wrote:
> Hey Anthony, thanks for the comments.
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>
>> Hello Jay,
>>
>> Cool idea! I like to see work on structured arrays. Just a couple of
>> questions:
>>
>>- Since there are already have
Hey Anthony, thanks for the comments.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> Hello Jay,
>
> Cool idea! I like to see work on structured arrays. Just a couple of
> questions:
>
>- Since there are already have ufuncs for primitive dtypes (int,
>float, etc), and you are
Hello Jay,
Cool idea! I like to see work on structured arrays. Just a couple of
questions:
- Since there are already have ufuncs for primitive dtypes (int, float,
etc), and you are just acting columnwise here, can't you write a single
function which interprets the dtypes, gathers the a
All,
I've submitted the following pull request for NumPy:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/462
This change allows ufuncs to be registered for structured arrays by using a
new API method PyUFunc_RegisterLoopForStructType. For example, a ufunc
could be registered to take two arrays of type 'u8,
