Re: [Numpy-discussion] Checking matrix condition number

2017-01-26 Thread Ilhan Polat
I've indeed opened an issue for this : https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8090 . Recently, I've included the LAPACK routines into SciPy dev version that will come with version 0.19. Then you can use ?GECON, ?POCON and other ?XXCON routines for yourself or wait a bit more until I have time to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to support __format__

2017-02-15 Thread Ilhan Polat
On the last item, do we really have to follow that strange, `d`,`g` and so on conventions on formatting? With all respect to the humongous historical baggage, I think that notation is pretty archaic and terminal like. If being pythonic is of a concern here, maybe it is better to use a more verbose

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Backslash operator A\b and np/sp.linalg.solve

2017-01-09 Thread Ilhan Polat
pe of fast checks. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:30 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Note that you're proposing a new scipy feature (right?) on the numpy >> list >&g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Backslash operator A\b and np/sp.linalg.solve

2017-01-09 Thread Ilhan Polat
<robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So every test in the polyalgorithm is cheaper than the next one. I'm not > exactly sure what might be the best strategy yet hence the question. It's > really i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Backslash operator A\b and np/sp.linalg.solve

2017-01-09 Thread Ilhan Polat
> Note that you're proposing a new scipy feature (right?) on the numpy list > This sounds like a good idea to me. As a former heavy Matlab user I remember a lot of things to dislike, but "\" behavior was quite nice. Correct, I am not sure where this might go in. It seemed like a NumPy array

[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Backslash operator A\b and np/sp.linalg.solve

2017-01-08 Thread Ilhan Polat
Hi everyone, I was stalking the deprecating the numpy.matrix discussion on the other thread and I wondered maybe the mailing list is a better place for the discussion about something I've been meaning to ask the dev members. I thought mailing lists are something we dumped using together with ICQ

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Backslash operator A\b and np/sp.linalg.solve

2017-01-10 Thread Ilhan Polat
10, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, that's precisely the case but when we know the structure we can > just choose the appropriate solver anyhow with a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Ilhan Polat
In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so that people can see that this is an open issue? As we close them they disappear from the issues tab on Github On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Ilhan Polat
By the way, this is not bad at all in the absence of the actual documentation http://devdocs.io/numpy~1.12/ On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so > that pe