Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809 -branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/1/10 Arjen de Korte nut+de...@de-korte.org nut%2bde...@de-korte.org Citeren emilien...@eaton.com: The main reason is to homogenize directive names between apps (mainly upsmon which uses CERTPATH and upsd which uses CERTNAME) to set the same property. Why? The use of CERTFILE

Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809-branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-11 Thread EmilienKia
2011/1/10 Arjen de Korte nut+de...@de-korte.org mailto:nut%2bde...@de-korte.org Citeren emilien...@eaton.com: The main reason is to homogenize directive names between apps (mainly upsmon which uses

Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809-branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-11 Thread EmilienKia
2011/1/10 Arjen de Korte nut+de...@de-korte.org mailto:nut%2bde...@de-korte.org Citeren emilien...@eaton.com: The main reason is to homogenize directive names between apps

Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809-branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-11 Thread Arjen de Korte
Citeren emilien...@eaton.com: What about CERTPATH in upsmon.conf ? Don't touch that. This is indeed a path... :-) This is where the upsmon client looks for the CA that signed the certificate presented by the server. So unlike the server, this is indeed a directory that holds the trusted

Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809 -branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-10 Thread EmilienKia
Objet : Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809 -branches/ssl-nss-port/server Citeren Emilien Kia emilienkia-gu...@alioth.debian.org: Author: emilienkia-guest Date: Fri Jan 7 14:44:25 2011 New Revision: 2809 URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2809 Log

Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809 -branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/1/10 emilien...@eaton.com Hi Arjen, Hi all, The main reason is to homogenize directive names between apps (mainly upsmon which uses CERTPATH and upsd which uses CERTNAME) to set the same property. Note that the CERTFILE directive is working but is just flagged as deprecated. As ssl

Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809 -branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-10 Thread Arjen de Korte
Citeren emilien...@eaton.com: The main reason is to homogenize directive names between apps (mainly upsmon which uses CERTPATH and upsd which uses CERTNAME) to set the same property. Why? The use of CERTFILE (OpenSSL only) and CERTPATH/CERTIDENT/CERTREQUEST (NSS only) is completely

Re: [Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r2809 -branches/ssl-nss-port/server

2011-01-10 Thread Arjen de Korte
Citeren Arnaud Quette aquette@gmail.com: I would also add that documentation will also be in that way: UPGRADING will inform existing users to move to CERTPATH, and user documentation will note CERTFILE as deprecated in favor of CERTPATH. I couldn't disagree more. Using CERTPATH would