Re: [Nut-upsdev] upsclient high level API and Java wrapping

2011-07-10 Thread David Goncalves
Hi, @David and Gabor: as owners of language binding, we would be more than happy to see you participating in this effort. And more generally, if you have comments, ideas or needs, please send in or jump into the thread. I was not member of the nut-upsdev mailing list and then was not aware o

Re: [Nut-upsdev] upsclient high level API and Java wrapping

2011-07-08 Thread Charles Lepple
On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:06 AM, wrote: This mail is a reply to mails from Charles Lepple and Petr Kubánek dated from july 7 with the same topic. From: Charles Lepple "One thing with SWIG (and other binding systems) is that it is not easy to handle errors gracefully. I can't count how many tim

Re: [Nut-upsdev] upsclient high level API and Java wrapping

2011-07-07 Thread EmilienKia
This mail is a reply to mails from Charles Lepple and Petr Kubánek dated from july 7 with the same topic. > From: Charles Lepple > > "One thing with SWIG (and other binding systems) is that it is not > easy to handle errors gracefully. I can't count how many times I got > segmentation violat

Re: [Nut-upsdev] upsclient high level API and Java wrapping

2011-07-06 Thread Petr Kubánek
Hi, I fully agree with arguments about not using SWIG. I was using it back in ~200[12] to work with CCD camera from Python, and it was horrible mess. I later decided to rewrite full project to C++ and never thing any good about Swig. Have another encounter with it around 2005 in another CCD driver

Re: [Nut-upsdev] upsclient high level API and Java wrapping

2011-07-06 Thread Charles Lepple
On Jul 6, 2011, at 5:58 AM, wrote: Hi all, on proposal by Arnaud Quette and sponsored by Eaton, I will work on a port on Java of client, discovery and config API. As I have already suggested (mail of 2011-06-14 of this ml), instead of developping another port of nut protocol, I suggest t

Re: [Nut-upsdev] upsclient high level API and Java wrapping

2011-07-06 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dear developers, contributors and integrators, 2011/7/6 > ** > > Hi all, > > on proposal by Arnaud Quette and sponsored by Eaton, I will work on a port > on Java of client, discovery and config API. > > As I have already suggested (mail of 2011-06-14 of this ml), instead of > developping another

[Nut-upsdev] upsclient high level API and Java wrapping

2011-07-06 Thread EmilienKia
Hi all, on proposal by Arnaud Quette and sponsored by Eaton, I will work on a port on Java of client, discovery and config API. As I have already suggested (mail of 2011-06-14 of this ml), instead of developping another port of nut protocol, I suggest to develop a higher level API in C/C++ u