Re: [Nut-upsuser] PR to test for users of Qx devices (blazer and nutdrv_qx)

2023-09-13 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
Thanks! So, comparing this with the January report -- there are no substantial changes in device discovery process and the collected info. However, the 10K seems to actually report most of the data which we have to "guesstimate" in other cases. Hoping somebody else with QX devices would

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Multiple battery levels to trigger actions?

2023-09-13 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
Hello, I think this should be possible, probably with dummy-ups or clone* drivers and respective override.* definitions in the "secondary drivers" So if something does not work here, I'm ready to consider it a bug. Can you post samples of config and logs (are there any errors?) One thing

Re: [Nut-upsuser] PR to test for users of Qx devices (blazer and nutdrv_qx)

2023-09-13 Thread d tbsky via Nut-upsuser
jim Klimov > > Hello all, > > Had another hard look at the PR for QX device voltage/charge/runtime fixes > for some broken use-cases (AND hoping to not introduce problems for cases > that were not broken), and hopefully found and rolled back the change which > in fact introduced the

[Nut-upsuser] Multiple battery levels to trigger actions?

2023-09-13 Thread Steffen Grunewald
Good morning NUTcrackers, several years ago, I had a setup that used the SNMP driver to collect data from a networked UPS and act as a source for multiple "secondary" drivers that each had a different battery level to trigger various actions, e.g. at 70% shut down some services, at 50% freeze the