Thanks Roger for the proposed changes, now they are largely incorporated
into this PR: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1046
For the community at large: can I assume everyone with an opinion about
this introduction of "experimental.*" prefix for contributor-defined
concepts in new NUT d
On Fri, 28 May 2021, Roger Price wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2021, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev wrote:
Looking at NUT pull request (PR) history on GitHub, I see that we have had
a non-trivial number of stalled driver contributions sharing a prominent
similarity: proposed names for some of the variabl
On Fri, 28 May 2021, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev wrote:
Looking at NUT pull request (PR) history on GitHub, I see that we have
had a non-trivial number of stalled driver contributions sharing a prominent
similarity: proposed names for some of the variables did not fit into the list
defined at ht
