Re: [Nut-upsuser] [Nut-upsdev] Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns

2023-08-07 Thread Greg Troxel
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev writes: > While looking at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2014 > I understood that I am not sure if currently NUT has a standard way of > triggering a shutdown based on remaining charge or runtime, if a > device/driver lacks a `battery.charge.low`

Re: [Nut-upsuser] [Nut-upsdev] Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns

2023-08-06 Thread Arnaldo H Viegas de Lima
My view is that this rests at the upsmon side. Each monitor would look at the status and decide to act as per its own configuration. Sent from my iPhone with  iTyposOn Aug 6, 2023, at 5:25 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:From my understanding, alone with other NUT behaviors it would not.Even if NUT

Re: [Nut-upsuser] [Nut-upsdev] Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns

2023-08-06 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
>From my understanding, alone with other NUT behaviors it would not. Even if NUT drivers already do (or are changed to) react to the actual charge/runtime going below this setting to fabricate an LB status, this as a driver setting/override would have immediate effect on all clients like `upsmon`

Re: [Nut-upsuser] [Nut-upsdev] Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns

2023-08-06 Thread Strahil Nikolov via Nut-upsuser
Hi Jim, I was thinking about setting different values for each device , so the first system has higher values and shutdowns  earlier:override.battery.charge.lowoverride.battery.runtime.low Won’t it work ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov  On Sunday, August 6, 2023, 7:41 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev