Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point [CyberPower SNMP/USB]

2019-01-28 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 1/28/19 9:10 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 27, 2019, at 10:56 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> >> I'm not 100% certain I'm tracking what you mean by 'scaled to the >> transfer voltage range' though. Could you clarify? >> > > The "output.voltage" column in the quoted portion at the link is

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point [CyberPower SNMP/USB]

2019-01-28 Thread Charles Lepple
On Jan 27, 2019, at 10:56 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > I'm not 100% certain I'm tracking what you mean by 'scaled to the > transfer voltage range' though. Could you clarify? > The "output.voltage" column in the quoted portion at the link is clipped/scaled to the range 136.0 to 142.0, which

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point [CyberPower SNMP/USB]

2019-01-27 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 1/27/19 9:49 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > You might be lucky with this particular model, but definitely beware of the > USB issues I mentioned in another thread: > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22CyberPower+%28CPS%29%22 > > The output of upsc i

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point [CyberPower SNMP/USB]

2019-01-27 Thread Charles Lepple
On Jan 27, 2019, at 9:31 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > On 1/27/19 9:13 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> I forget, is your copy of NUT built from an RPM? If so, it shouldn't be >> too hard to add that patch to get load, charge, input voltage/frequency >> and output voltage (assuming the RM205 is a su

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point [CyberPower SNMP]

2019-01-27 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 1/27/19 9:13 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 27, 2019, at 2:36 PM, Phil Stracchino > wrote: >> The new Cyberpower PR3000 (also 3KVA), wqhich operates at a 90% power >> factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. >> >> I wasn't expecting that much of a reduct

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point [CyberPower SNMP]

2019-01-27 Thread Charles Lepple
On Jan 27, 2019, at 2:36 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > SO, my full load on my core UPS is two Dell R610s, one Sun X4540, one HP > DL360p gen8, two six-core Thuban-II workstations plua their monitors, > and the network stack and KVM. > > The APC SU3000RM (3KVA) that blew up last week considered

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point

2019-01-27 Thread Phil Stracchino
Best result so far is actually with usbhid-ups. I'm going to have to get a USB hub though. [backstop-usb] driver= usbhid-ups port = /dev/ttyUSB0 vendorid = 0764 productid = 0601 desc = "PR3000LCDRTXL2U USB" minbar:root:~:24 # upsc backstop-usb@localho

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point

2019-01-27 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 1/27/19 2:36 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > The HCL seems to imply that this UPS should *also* be supported by the > powerpanel driver. However, I see from the documentation that the > powerpanel driver is a lot of best-effort because cyberpower is > uncommunicative about details of the protocol,

[Nut-upsuser] Just an interesting data point

2019-01-27 Thread Phil Stracchino
SO, my full load on my core UPS is two Dell R610s, one Sun X4540, one HP DL360p gen8, two six-core Thuban-II workstations plua their monitors, and the network stack and KVM. The APC SU3000RM (3KVA) that blew up last week considered this to be just short of 60% load. The new Cyberpower PR3000 (also