On Thu, 7 Apr 2022, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
It is a bit stupid but nut uses a different port for so long that, to be
honest, I do not think that it matters any more.
It was not too bright of IANA to assign 401/TCP (ups) when 3493/TCP (nut) was
already available, but the problem was probably l
On April 7, 2022 12:13:21 PM GMT+03:00, Roger Price
wrote:
>I have received the following disappointing reply from IANA. It was precisely
>the IETF review/IESG approval that I was asking for.
>
>Meantime it seems to me to be an anomaly that the Network UPS Tools project is
>not able to use po
I have received the following disappointing reply from IANA. It was precisely
the IETF review/IESG approval that I was asking for.
Meantime it seems to me to be an anomaly that the Network UPS Tools project is
not able to use port ups intended for UPS management.
I will discuss the matter f
