Re: [Nut-upsuser] nut and megatec_usb

2009-07-31 Thread Arnaud Quette
2009/7/31 Alexander Gordeev > Hi Anton, > > On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:53:05 +0400 > Anton Gorlov wrote: > > > ut 2.4.1 works with megatec_usb driver. It tries to interact with a > > device in /dev/bus/usb/X/Y, but there are root:root 664 access > > rights. When I try to set port /dev/hiddev0 w

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild

2009-07-31 Thread Arnaud Quette
salut Antoine, 2009/7/31 Antoine Gatineau > I might ask a stupid question but isn't hal used to manage the UPS device > and connection through udev rules? > I though that hal was mostly usefull with usb... > > In the nut-hal document, it is said that HAL "allows NUT drivers to feed > the > HAL s

Re: [Nut-upsuser] nut and megatec_usb

2009-07-31 Thread Alexander Gordeev
Hi Anton, On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:53:05 +0400 Anton Gorlov wrote: > ut 2.4.1 works with megatec_usb driver. It tries to interact with a > device in /dev/bus/usb/X/Y, but there are root:root 664 access > rights. When I try to set port /dev/hiddev0 with write access in > config file, in strac

[Nut-upsuser] nut and megatec_usb

2009-07-31 Thread Anton Gorlov
ut 2.4.1 works with megatec_usb driver. It tries to interact with a device in /dev/bus/usb/X/Y, but there are root:root 664 access rights. When I try to set port /dev/hiddev0 with write access in config file, in strace there are no records about accessing /dev/hiddev, but still only /dev/

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild

2009-07-31 Thread Antoine Gatineau
I might ask a stupid question but isn't hal used to manage the UPS device and connection through udev rules? I though that hal was mostly usefull with usb... In the nut-hal document, it is said that HAL "allows NUT drivers to feed the HAL system, which will itself feeds applications such as the G

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild

2009-07-31 Thread Antoine Gatineau
Hi, I looked into the NEWS file, as well as in the ChangeLog. But it says that upshid-ups has received a lot of attention, bugfix and improvement. Is there a bugzilla or so where I could search if my issue is listed or fixed? Thanks Antoine -Message d'origine- De : nut-upsuser-bounces+

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild

2009-07-31 Thread Charles Lepple
On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Antoine Gatineau wrote: Indeed, nut depends on some packages not the distribution itself. You are surely right. Anyway, here are the links : RHEL 4 : ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/EPEL/4ES/SRPMS/ nut-2.2.0-4.el4.src.rpm RHEL 5 : nut-2.4.1 found only on this one http://w

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild

2009-07-31 Thread Antoine Gatineau
Indeed, nut depends on some packages not the distribution itself. You are surely right. Anyway, here are the links : RHEL 4 : ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/EPEL/4ES/SRPMS/nut-2.2.0-4.el4.src.rpm RHEL 5 : nut-2.4.1 found only on this one http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/nut/SRPM/ On rpmfind.net, nut-2.4.1

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild

2009-07-31 Thread Charles Lepple
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Antoine Gatineau wrote: > Well I have tried to upgrade the nut drivers but it can't compile on RHEL4 > due to dependencies. > Newer nut require RHEL5. Am I right? Nothing in NUT itself depends on RHEL5, but the RPM spec file might be written to require versions of

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Usbhip-ups going wild

2009-07-31 Thread Antoine Gatineau
Thanks for the answer. Well I have tried to upgrade the nut drivers but it can't compile on RHEL4 due to dependencies. Newer nut require RHEL5. Am I right? Is this bug known and fixed in recent versions? Thanks -Message d'origine- De : nut-upsuser-bounces+antoine.gatineau=alcatel-lucen