2009/7/31 Alexander Gordeev
> Hi Anton,
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:53:05 +0400
> Anton Gorlov wrote:
>
> > ut 2.4.1 works with megatec_usb driver. It tries to interact with a
> > device in /dev/bus/usb/X/Y, but there are root:root 664 access
> > rights. When I try to set port /dev/hiddev0 w
salut Antoine,
2009/7/31 Antoine Gatineau
> I might ask a stupid question but isn't hal used to manage the UPS device
> and connection through udev rules?
> I though that hal was mostly usefull with usb...
>
> In the nut-hal document, it is said that HAL "allows NUT drivers to feed
> the
> HAL s
Hi Anton,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:53:05 +0400
Anton Gorlov wrote:
> ut 2.4.1 works with megatec_usb driver. It tries to interact with a
> device in /dev/bus/usb/X/Y, but there are root:root 664 access
> rights. When I try to set port /dev/hiddev0 with write access in
> config file, in strac
ut 2.4.1 works with megatec_usb driver. It tries to interact with a
device in /dev/bus/usb/X/Y, but there are root:root 664 access rights.
When I try to set port /dev/hiddev0 with write access in config
file, in strace there are no records about accessing /dev/hiddev, but
still only /dev/
I might ask a stupid question but isn't hal used to manage the UPS device
and connection through udev rules?
I though that hal was mostly usefull with usb...
In the nut-hal document, it is said that HAL "allows NUT drivers to feed the
HAL system, which will itself feeds
applications such as the G
Hi,
I looked into the NEWS file, as well as in the ChangeLog.
But it says that upshid-ups has received a lot of attention, bugfix and
improvement.
Is there a bugzilla or so where I could search if my issue is listed or
fixed?
Thanks
Antoine
-Message d'origine-
De :
nut-upsuser-bounces+
On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Antoine Gatineau wrote:
Indeed, nut depends on some packages not the distribution itself.
You are surely right.
Anyway, here are the links :
RHEL 4 : ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/EPEL/4ES/SRPMS/
nut-2.2.0-4.el4.src.rpm
RHEL 5 : nut-2.4.1 found only on this one
http://w
Indeed, nut depends on some packages not the distribution itself.
You are surely right.
Anyway, here are the links :
RHEL 4 : ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/EPEL/4ES/SRPMS/nut-2.2.0-4.el4.src.rpm
RHEL 5 : nut-2.4.1 found only on this one
http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/nut/SRPM/
On rpmfind.net, nut-2.4.1
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Antoine
Gatineau wrote:
> Well I have tried to upgrade the nut drivers but it can't compile on RHEL4
> due to dependencies.
> Newer nut require RHEL5. Am I right?
Nothing in NUT itself depends on RHEL5, but the RPM spec file might be
written to require versions of
Thanks for the answer.
Well I have tried to upgrade the nut drivers but it can't compile on RHEL4
due to dependencies.
Newer nut require RHEL5. Am I right?
Is this bug known and fixed in recent versions?
Thanks
-Message d'origine-
De :
nut-upsuser-bounces+antoine.gatineau=alcatel-lucen
10 matches
Mail list logo