On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26:41PM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
> [please keep this thread on-list - that way other people can reference
> it later.]
>
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 10:24 PM, James Erickson wrote:
>
> >> Please run "/lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a cyberpower -u root -x
> >> productid=0601", and
On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:30 PM, James Erickson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26:41PM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
[please keep this thread on-list - that way other people can
reference
it later.]
On Aug 10, 2009, at 10:24 PM, James Erickson wrote:
Please run "/lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a cyber
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26:41PM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
> [please keep this thread on-list - that way other people can reference
> it later.]
>
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 10:24 PM, James Erickson wrote:
>
> >> Please run "/lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a cyberpower -u root -x
> >> productid=0601", and
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26:41PM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
> [please keep this thread on-list - that way other people can reference
> it later.]
>
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 10:24 PM, James Erickson wrote:
>
> >> Please run "/lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a cyberpower -u root -x
> >> productid=0601", and
[please keep this thread on-list - that way other people can reference
it later.]
On Aug 10, 2009, at 10:24 PM, James Erickson wrote:
Please run "/lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a cyberpower -u root -x
productid=0601", and if we need additional detail, we'll add a few
more "-D"s to the line. (The debug
On Aug 10, 2009, at 9:40 PM, James Erickson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:35:51PM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:50 PM, James Erickson wrote:
The OR2200LCDRM2U is a native USB device and does not utilize any
adapters like our older UPS designs do. The USB port design
On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:50 PM, James Erickson wrote:
The OR2200LCDRM2U is a native USB device and does not utilize any
adapters like our older UPS designs do. The USB port design in its
most
basic form should be the same as the 685AVR, 800AVR, and AE550 that
are
listed as compatible with the
Begin forwarded message:
From: James Erickson
Date: August 10, 2009 2:50:52 PM EDT
To: Charles Lepple
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] CyberPower OR2200
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:38:32PM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
From: James Erickson
Date: August 9, 2009 6:17:51 PM EDT
To: Charles Lepple
Sub
2009/8/10 Charles Lepple
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>
> "Can't claim the device" even if I run as root
>>
>> iirc, there was no detach_device() primitive outside of linux.
>>
>
> In older versions of Mac OS X (either 10.3 or 10.4) you could ignore the
> return code when
On Aug 10, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
"Can't claim the device" even if I run as root
iirc, there was no detach_device() primitive outside of linux.
In older versions of Mac OS X (either 10.3 or 10.4) you could ignore
the return code when claiming the device, and the two processe
On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:00 AM, Christian Huldt wrote:
I'm not sure of the consequences of removing disabling ioupsd, but I
would expect it to be restored by software updates at an
unpredictable rate...
There should be a way to disable it. I'm looking into it.
2009/8/10 Christian Huldt
>
> Christian Huldt
> christ...@solvare.se
> +46704612207
>
>
>
> 9 aug 2009 kl. 21.55 skrev Charles Lepple:
>
> On Aug 9, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Christian Huldt wrote:
>>
>> Is there some smart way of not having ioupsd claming the device on mac os
>>> x?
>>>
>>
>> My only
12 matches
Mail list logo
