On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> %configure \
> --with-all \
> --without-powerman \
> --without-freeipmi \
> [...]
>
>
> but it still tries (and fails) to detect the ipmi libs, after which it bails
> out:
What about "--with-all=auto" ?
--
Charles Lepple
cl
On 09/29/2012 04:36 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
What if you just comment out "autoreconf -i"? It really shouldn't be
necessary. If the generated ./configure script is wrong, chances are
we can fix it in the NUT source (unless RHEL is even more busted than
I thought).
That did it but now I h
On 09/29/2012 01:39 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
On Sep 28, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 09/28/2012 06:27 PM, twhit...@clearbearing.com wrote:
quick question, Is there an issue with centos 5 that prevents it from running
Nut greater then 2.2.3 ?
No. It's just that there ar
On Sep 28, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 06:27 PM, twhit...@clearbearing.com wrote:
>> quick question, Is there an issue with centos 5 that prevents it from
>> running Nut greater then 2.2.3 ?
>>
>No. It's just that there are no official packages. I have tried ju
On 09/28/2012 06:27 PM, twhit...@clearbearing.com wrote:
quick question, Is there an issue with centos 5 that prevents it from
running Nut greater then 2.2.3 ?
No. It's just that there are no official packages. I have tried
just yesterday to compile 2.6.6 and failed due to incompatible aut
quick question, Is there an issue with centos 5 that prevents it from
running Nut greater then 2.2.3 ?
On 09/25/2012 07:02 PM, Charles Lepple wrote:
On Sep 25, 2012, at 4:31 PM, twhit...@clearbearing.com wrote:
Hey all,
I have a triplite 1050 and when I did a test today I saw that the batte
6 matches
Mail list logo
