hosts.allow temporarily. If that still doesn't work,
> it's likely something else. If it does, only then screw with creating
> narrow rules . . .
>
> - Tim
>
> On November 25, 2016 6:37:02 AM CST, Roger Price
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Nay
e slave is at risk as it shares the same ups in the same
cabinet, but is on a different network.
Also I'll remove that allowfrom option for now if it maybe isn't needed.
Thanks again.
On 25 November 2016 at 14:41, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote
t's not working. Also should
the "allowfrom = clientIPaddresshere" line be in my monuser entry in
upsd.users on the master, or should I take that out?
Thanks once again for the help.
On 25 November 2016 at 12:37, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote:
>
k you very much once again.
On 25 November 2016 at 12:00, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote:
>
> I don't think nut is built with TCP wrappers support, although the package
>> is listed as depending on libwrap...
>>
>
> Why would you h
d the
tcp wrapper support?
Thanks again.
On 24 November 2016 at 22:40, Roger Price wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote:
>
> I installed Nut via apt-get, not from source (which I'd rather stick with
>> if possible just for ease of security updates etc) - so I
h
prebuilt packages?
Thanks very much once again. :)
On 24 November 2016 at 21:51, Roger Price wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote:
>
> The servers can ping each other... The router log doesn't show anything
>> and I am the admin for the servers. The machines firew
Hi thanks for the reply.
The servers can ping each other...
The router log doesn't show anything and I am the admin for the servers.
The machines firewalls allow each other's ips etc.
Part of the issue is possibly that I just don't know if I've set up NUT
correctly for this arrangement? Like I s
Hi can anyone please help.
Although I have two servers in the same cabinet/room and sharing the same
UPS - they're on different networks.
I've tried everything I can find online, but whatever I do I can't get the
slave nut client to connect to the master.
When testing then on the same LAN, they
HI again, Sorry I didn't mean to cause a security debate.
I'd like things to be secure of course, but I've got a dilema that I don't
use DHCP and instead have a block of static IPs from my ISP.
So my nut server has 68.68.452.02 for example
and my two slave clients have 68.68.452.03 and .04
idea
Hi can anyone please help.
I have two linux servers both with static IPs not using NAT.
My slave can't connect to my host. Whatever I try.
I have the same setup also on my LAN with two other machines and they talk
to each other and work great.
But my two machines with their own static IPs don't
HI thanks for replying and helping.
I've now ran the UPS down a few times from full charge to test and I don't
think it's the batteries or a problem with the UPS itself. I can watch it
go from 100% right down to 1% over 20 minutes etc and then the power gets
so low that everything just powers off!
Hi I hope someone can please help.
I have an Ubuntu Server running 14.04.3 LTS and using an APC ES550 UPS
connected via USB.
I've installed Nut and can see it does monitor the UPS correctly and give
the correct stats with battery percentage etc.
But on doing a "real" test and unplugging the UPS
12 matches
Mail list logo
