Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

Citeren Maurice Volaski : upslogx(LOG_ERR, "[%s] %s: Error in packet: %s", This is a different message from what you reported before. These where logged with 'nut_snmp_get' in them and these lines should now be gone (unless running in debug mode 2 or higher). What message do you think I

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

>> Please don't mistake warning messages with (fatal) errors. Starting with nut-2.4.0, these messages should only be displayed in debug mode, so I'm surprised you're seeing them in nut-2.4.1. It doesn't seem this way from my reading of the source code: upslogx(LOG_ERR, "[%s] %s: Error in

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

Citeren Maurice Volaski : Please don't mistake warning messages with (fatal) errors. Starting with nut-2.4.0, these messages should only be displayed in debug mode, so I'm surprised you're seeing them in nut-2.4.1. It doesn't seem this way from my reading of the source code: upslogx(LOG_ER

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

Please don't mistake warning messages with (fatal) errors. Starting with nut-2.4.0, these messages should only be displayed in debug mode, so I'm surprised you're seeing them in nut-2.4.1. It doesn't seem this way from my reading of the source code: upslogx(LOG_ERR, "[%s] %s: Error in packet:

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

Citeren Maurice Volaski : This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to this one without downgrading the whole package? yes, only take the snmp-ups driver from the previous working release. 2.2.2 and 2.0.5 also complain but with fewer errors. Please don't mis

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

At 9:11 AM +0200 7/27/09, Arnaud Quette wrote: 2009/7/27 Maurice Volaski <mvola...@aecom.yu.edu> This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to this one without downgrading the whole package? yes, only take the snmp-ups driver from

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

Citeren Maurice Volaski : This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to this one without downgrading the whole package? When did this stop working (from which version to nut-2.4.1 did you upgrade)? The last changes to the IETF are made almost two years ago. A

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

2009/7/27 Maurice Volaski > This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to > this one without downgrading the whole package? > yes, only take the snmp-ups driver from the previous working release. Note that Liebert is not registered with SNMP support in our compat l

[Nut-upsuser] Any word on when the ietf mib will be fixed for liebert?

This mib used to work, so is there a way to go back to the version prior to this one without downgrading the whole package? * Starting UPS drivers... Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.1 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.44 (2.4.1) Detected GXT2-2000RT120 o