Re: [Nut-upsuser] Re: Newpoint 200897 UPS

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Selinger
Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:15:45 -0400, Peter Selinger wrote: > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > we have seen device 0d9f/0001 before (possibly under a different name, > > but this is common), and as far as I remember we could not get it to > > work. See the thread named "Gentoo

[Nut-upsuser] Re: Newpoint 200897 UPS

2006-12-30 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:44:06 -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:15:45 -0400, Peter Selinger wrote: > >> What was the output that you got from >> drivers/newhidups -DD -u root -x explore -x vendorid= auto > > Unfortunately, I deleted that /tmp/info file shortly after c

[Nut-upsuser] Re: Newpoint 200897 UPS

2006-12-30 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:15:45 -0400, Peter Selinger wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > we have seen device 0d9f/0001 before (possibly under a different name, > but this is common), and as far as I remember we could not get it to > work. See the thread named "Gentoo Ultra USB UPS" on nut-upsuser in > July/Aug

[Nut-upsuser] Re: Newpoint 200897 UPS

2006-12-30 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:57:04 -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > I got sick & tired of constant power outages with no warning, so when I [the rest snipped] I just noticed something else: My syslog has been filling up with the following: Dec 29 23:57:30 XB9526JJHLA upsd[1605]: Connected to UPS [ne