[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-04-03 Thread Hari Kodungallur
On Apr 3, 2005 1:16 PM, Jérôme Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The best process to avoid such situation is to create issues on jira. Isn't > it? > Jira must be the referencial for new features, bug, fixes, patches. No? > No question. -

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-04-03 Thread Jérôme Charron
> Seems like Jerome has spent quite a bit of his time and effort into > this. We can just take his contribution for the mime/magic mapper. I > have no issues with that. The last thing we need is to review two > pieces of code doing the same thing. The best process to avoid such situation is to cr

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-04-03 Thread Jérôme Charron
Hello, I'm very disapointed by this mail. In fact, I annouce, two weeks ago that I was currently working on a Extension/MimeType mapper and MagicNumber/MimeTye mapper. And I created an issue related to this point too, in which I mentionned I was working on it !! My implementation is now ready to

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-04-03 Thread Hari Kodungallur
Oops.. forgot to do "reply all". Seding again to the group. John, please ignore the attachment in my prvs email, use this one instead (an extra backup file got into the other one) Here's a first version of the mime-mapper and magic-mime-mapper. i

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-29 Thread Doug Cutting
Hari Kodungallur wrote: Does nutch have a requirement to be compatibel with JDK 1.3.x? No. Nutch is meant to work with JDK 1.4+. Doug --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-29 Thread Hari Kodungallur
Does nutch have a requirement to be compatibel with JDK 1.3.x? I would like to use the java.nio.* package, but I wanted to find out about the requirement before it is too late :) thanks -Hari On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:47:47 -0800, John X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:36:12

Re: [Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-25 Thread Doug Cutting
Andy Hedges wrote: So I've modified the ant file and it works in the following way. If the file hasn't been downloaded it does so. Even if the src has been download it may not have been compiled and jared and so that is checked and if necessary it is build. It then removes all the intermediate file

Re: [Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-25 Thread Andy Hedges
Doug Cutting wrote: > Andy Hedges wrote: > >> As you can see for rtf I need to do more than just download the jar >> file as there is not a precompiled version on the net. I have to >> download the source and then run a number of steps to get to the >> resulting jar. I'm not sure that the plug

Re: [Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-25 Thread Doug Cutting
Andy Hedges wrote: As you can see for rtf I need to do more than just download the jar file as there is not a precompiled version on the net. I have to download the source and then run a number of steps to get to the resulting jar. I'm not sure that the plugin's build.xml is the place to be doi

Re: [Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-25 Thread Andy Hedges
Doug, As you can see for rtf I need to do more than just download the jar file as there is not a precompiled version on the net. I have to download the source and then run a number of steps to get to the resulting jar. I'm not sure that the plugin's build.xml is the place to be doing this as i

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread John X
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:36:12PM -0800, Hari Kodungallur wrote: > Hi John, > > I will do them. No problems. > But one question: for (3) is there any other way other than reading > the /usr/share/magic.mime file? I am curious whether there is a > platform independent way which I am not aware of.

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread Hari Kodungallur
Hi John, I will do them. No problems. But one question: for (3) is there any other way other than reading the /usr/share/magic.mime file? I am curious whether there is a platform independent way which I am not aware of... thanks -Hari > Ideally we need something that provides mapping among: >

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread John X
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:35:30AM -0800, Hari Kodungallur wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:51:53 -0800, John X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It will be great if you can help on that. Plugin index-more also uses it. > > I know there are two opensource efforts: > > http://jafi.sourceforge.net/m

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread Andy Hedges
Yes, makes perfect sense and is almost certainly less work :). Jakarta Cactus uses a similar methodology that I'm sure we can reuse here. I'll take a look this weekend and see what I can come up with. Thanks, Andy Doug Cutting wrote: Andy Hedges wrote: Was just checking through the mailing

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread Hari Kodungallur
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:51:53 -0800, John X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It will be great if you can help on that. Plugin index-more also uses it. > I know there are two opensource efforts: > http://jafi.sourceforge.net/maven-reports.html > http://www.gnu.org/software/classpathx/jaf/jaf.html > Th

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread Doug Cutting
Andy Hedges wrote: Was just checking through the mailing list to see how things were going with Nutch. It seems that two of my contributions had to be removed because they aren't compatible with the ASF licenses (rtf and mp3 parsers). So what needs to be done to get them back in? Do alternat

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread Hari Kodungallur
Doug, I also noticed that the file:// and ftp:// protocol plugins are disabled because it uses the activation.jar (I think Sun's jar files are not redistributable). I looked into the files and all it uses it the MimetypeFileType and MimeType classes from the activation.jar. I have seen that some o

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-23 Thread John X
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:02:17PM -0800, Hari Kodungallur wrote: > Doug, > > I also noticed that the file:// and ftp:// protocol plugins are > disabled because it uses the activation.jar (I think Sun's jar files > are not redistributable). > I looked into the files and all it uses it the Mimetype

[Nutch-dev] Re: Licenses

2005-03-22 Thread Doug Cutting
Hari Kodungallur wrote: I also noticed that the file:// and ftp:// protocol plugins are disabled because it uses the activation.jar (I think Sun's jar files are not redistributable). I looked into the files and all it uses it the MimetypeFileType and MimeType classes from the activation.jar. I have