Dan Williams wrote:
> Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Dan Williams wrote:
> > > The reference counting of dax_region objects is needlessly complicated,
> > > has lead to confusion [1], and has hidden a bug [2]. Towards cleaning up
> > > that mess introduce alloc_dev_dax_id() to minimize the holding of a
> >
Ira Weiny wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > The reference counting of dax_region objects is needlessly complicated,
> > has lead to confusion [1], and has hidden a bug [2]. Towards cleaning up
> > that mess introduce alloc_dev_dax_id() to minimize the holding of a
> > dax_region reference to only
Dan Williams wrote:
> The reference counting of dax_region objects is needlessly complicated,
> has lead to confusion [1], and has hidden a bug [2]. Towards cleaning up
> that mess introduce alloc_dev_dax_id() to minimize the holding of a
> dax_region reference to only what dev_dax_release()
The reference counting of dax_region objects is needlessly complicated,
has lead to confusion [1], and has hidden a bug [2]. Towards cleaning up
that mess introduce alloc_dev_dax_id() to minimize the holding of a
dax_region reference to only what dev_dax_release() needs, the
dax_region->ida.
Part
