[nznog] Phish? Re: .NZ would like 5 minutes of your time

It's an email apparently from one party (NZRS), apparently sent by a second party (my registrar), via a third party (mscv.net) with a link to a fourth party (surveymonkey.com), which seems classic phishing. On the other hand it "looks quite legit". If it is legit, am I right in thinking it's a

Re: [nznog] Phish? Re: .NZ would like 5 minutes of your time

On 16/09/15 20:58, Sebastian Castro wrote: If it is legit, am I right in thinking it's a bad way to go about it? > >Any comments from participants? This is our first attempt to collect information this way, definitely this kind of point will be taken into account next time. Thanks Sebastian,

Re: [nznog] Can whois registrar info be wrong?

You need to start with the current whois information and contact the listed parties. On 2015-09-17 10:52, Richard Hector wrote: On 17/09/15 10:44, Jonathan Brewer wrote: On 17 September 2015 at 09:24, Richard Hector > wrote: Is it

Re: [nznog] Can whois registrar info be wrong?

Richard > Is it technically possible for the registrar details in whois (for a > .com domain) be out of date, or is the whois the canonical source of the > info? If it is possible, how would I go about finding out who's really > in control? Does a registrar have an interface for that? .com is a

Re: [nznog] Can whois registrar info be wrong?

On 17/09/15 10:44, Jonathan Brewer wrote: On 17 September 2015 at 09:24, Richard Hector > wrote: Is it technically possible for the registrar details in whois (for a .com domain) be out of date Yes. WHOIS hasn't been accurate in