[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6) Setup integration tests and TCK tests

2012-04-25 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13261382#comment-13261382 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6: -- TCK status 2012-04-25: Tests: 1905, Errors: 1471,

JCR-MK property mapping

2012-04-25 Thread Julian Reschke
Just a thought: Would it make sense to optimize the persistence in that we wouldn't store the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured? Best regards, Julian

Re: JCR-MK property mapping

2012-04-25 Thread Michael Dürig
On 25.4.12 9:54, Julian Reschke wrote: Just a thought: Would it make sense to optimize the persistence in that we wouldn't store the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured? I'd say yes as long as it is also robust enough to handle the case where nt:unstructured is stored

[jira] [Created] (OAK-72) Implement JCR API (jsr 283, jcr 333)

2012-04-25 Thread angela (JIRA)
angela created OAK-72: - Summary: Implement JCR API (jsr 283, jcr 333) Key: OAK-72 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-72 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Components: jcr

Re: JCR-MK property mapping

2012-04-25 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: Would it make sense to optimize the persistence in that we wouldn't store the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured? Yes, though the default type should be something like oak:unstructured or

Re: JCR-MK property mapping

2012-04-25 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am 25.04.2012 um 11:40 schrieb Jukka Zitting: Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: Would it make sense to optimize the persistence in that we wouldn't store the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured? Yes, though the default

Re: JCR-MK property mapping

2012-04-25 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2012-04-25 11:48, Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Am 25.04.2012 um 11:40 schrieb Jukka Zitting: Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschkejulian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: Would it make sense to optimize the persistence in that we wouldn't store the primary type when it happens to be

Re: JCR-MK property mapping

2012-04-25 Thread Michael Dürig
On 25.4.12 12:01, Julian Reschke wrote: On 2012-04-25 11:48, Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Am 25.04.2012 um 11:40 schrieb Jukka Zitting: Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschkejulian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: Would it make sense to optimize the persistence in that we wouldn't

[jira] [Created] (OAK-74) avoid use of internal namespace

2012-04-25 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
Julian Reschke created OAK-74: - Summary: avoid use of internal namespace Key: OAK-74 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-74 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Wish

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-73) JsopReader lacks any javadoc description

2012-04-25 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13261723#comment-13261723 ] Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-73: --- Sure. Partially the documentation is there, but in the

Re: Proposal for Value Handling (oak-jcr and oak-core)

2012-04-25 Thread Angela Schreiber
hi all as a next step i will address the last major issue in this area: encoding non-json property types before writing to the MicroKernel (currently in KernelRoot#encode) and the other way round (currently in KernelNodeState#readValue). in a first step i will move both methods to a utility

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-45) Add support for branching and merging of private copies to MicroKernel

2012-04-25 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13261780#comment-13261780 ] Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-45: -- thanks, will investigate Add