Re: Identifier (UUID) handling

2012-05-29 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi, >I'm fine with getNodeByUUID() relying on the query system. The query >system on the other hand should be able to work even when no indexes >are available, falling back to tree traversal when all else fails. Yes, that's the current plan. This is not an urgent feature, but if no index is avai

Re: Identifier (UUID) handling

2012-05-29 Thread Michael Dürig
On 27.5.12 1:14, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: 1) NodeImpl tries to set jcr:uuid when needed (this is still a hack because it should happen down in the stack, and take the actual effective node type into account) Yes. This should go into a

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-32) Drop MicroKernel.dispose()

2012-05-29 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-32: - Attachment: OAK-32.patch proposed patch > Drop MicroKernel.dispose() > -

[jira] [Created] (OAK-117) MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method

2012-05-29 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-117: - Summary: MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method Key: OAK-117 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-117 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Ty

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-117) MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method

2012-05-29 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Guggisberg reassigned OAK-117: - Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg > MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method > --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-117) MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method

2012-05-29 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13284816#comment-13284816 ] Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-117: --- I strongly think that this should be handled within th

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-117) MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method

2012-05-29 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13284818#comment-13284818 ] Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-117: Sounds good! But I wonder if it would prevent us to

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-105) Workspace move operation should not do sanity checks in the scope of the current session

2012-05-29 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig resolved OAK-105. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.3 > Workspace move operation should not do sanity checks i

Oak 0.3 release plan

2012-05-29 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, A few of us from Adobe are getting together in Hamburg for a short Oak hackathon over today and tomorrow. Some of our key goals are finishing up the commit hook plugin model and better integration with alternative MicroKernel backends. Once we're done, I think it's time to cut the 0.3 release