Hi,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
3rd try: http://svn.apache.org/r1583661
Looks good, thanks!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
+1. I also missed getting a clean way to get blobId from Blob. So
adding
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
I consider this an unfortunate recent development.
Not sure. There are some deployment scenarios where a shared
FileDataStore is a must requirement and thus we need to support cases
where blobs can be stored separately
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
The getContentIdentity() method has a specific contract and the return
value should generally not be interpreted as a referenceable
identifier.
Ack.
If you need a method that exposes the blobId, it would be best to
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3984
Status: Broken
Duration: 225 seconds
Commit: 80a80e69175ce237ac586a7acd51177694879c08 (trunk)
Author: Chetan Mehrotra
Message: OAK-1295 - Recovery for missing _lastRev updates (WIP)
Added specific method
On 2.4.14 8:06 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
Why the . extra subdirectory?
The repository home folder is used by various components in Oak.
I consider this an unfortunate recent development.
Most parts in
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3985
Status: Broken
Duration: 286 seconds
Commit: 10c89f108d2c1e9cbd440860f1f2e590b2ee3760 (trunk)
Author: Chetan Mehrotra
Message: OAK-1295 - Recovery for missing _lastRev updates (WIP)
Fix the not query for
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3986
Status: Broken
Duration: 273 seconds
Commit: f02dd6b4943b85ec2365c6dc950ee414ada1b394 (trunk)
Author: Chetan Mehrotra
Message: OAK-1295 - Recovery for missing _lastRev updates (WIP)
Refactor
-- to use enum
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3984
Status: Broken
Duration: 1657 seconds
Commit: bb72c07081bb79a746dc01571e19948ba3f060c4 (trunk)
Author: Chetan Mehrotra
Message: OAK-1295 - Recovery for missing _lastRev updates (WIP)
Moving common methods
On 02/04/2014 07:48, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
I consider this an unfortunate recent development.
Not sure. There are some deployment scenarios where a shared
FileDataStore is a must requirement and thus we need to
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3987
Status: Errored
Duration: 3002 seconds
Commit: 67c04d7ecc5181ea0096e33b5bbddbe2f94236ee (trunk)
Author: Chetan Mehrotra
Message: OAK-1295 - Recovery for missing _lastRev updates (WIP)
Refactored to use new
On 02 Apr 2014, at 08:06, Jukka Zitting
jukka.zitt...@gmail.commailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
That design gets broken if components
start storing data separately in the repository folder.
Agree with that design principle, but the (shared) file system DS is a valid
exception IMO (same
Hi,
How do we expose _lastRev recovery operation? This would need to check all
the cluster nodes info and run recovery for those nodes which need recovery.
1. We either have a scheduled job which checks all the nodes and run the
recovery. What should be the interval to trigger the job?
2. Or if
Hi,
I think the recovery should be triggered automatically by the system when:
1) a cluster node starts up and sees it didn't shut down properly. I'm not
sure this information is available, but remember we discussed this once.
2) a cluster node sees a lease timeout of another cluster node and
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3990
Status: Passed
Duration: 2483 seconds
Commit: 28bd58f599ccc5a5ecaf28dec700fd80373b59e3 (trunk)
Author: Marcel Reutegger
Message: OAK-1663: Long running RevisionTest
Reset lastTimestamp to current time
Hi,
1) a cluster node starts up and sees it didn't shut down properly. I'm
not
sure this information is available, but remember we discussed this once.
Yes, this case has been taken care of in the startup.
this check could be done in the
background operations thread on a regular basis.
The lease time is set to 1 minute. Would it be ok to check this every
minute, from every node?
Adding to that the default time intervals are
- asyncDelay = 1 sec - The background operation are performed every 1
sec per cluster node. If nothing changes we would fire
1query/sec/cluster node to
@Chetan: why would the configs not be stored in the repo? I do not see how
this relates to non-OSGi environments
Well thats the basic config required to configure
DocumentNodeStore/SegmentNodeStore. These config cannot be stored as
content.
Other settings like security related config
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3991
Status: Passed
Duration: 2596 seconds
Commit: 3b8b4c7ff1b6a97b1867c96a9250488fec2351dc (trunk)
Author: Alexandru Parvulescu
Message: OAK-1664 org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.namepath package missing
package-info
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3992
Status: Passed
Duration: 2609 seconds
Commit: 3efb5cbfa81d2f770445ba2027ccc8e954f15c95 (trunk)
Author: Marcel Reutegger
Message: OAK-1662: Node not accessible after document split
git-svn-id:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3994
Status: Broken
Duration: 2194 seconds
Commit: 0e0a47ec387626e494a65dd143e3a25a3d004abe (trunk)
Author: Julian Reschke
Message: OAK-1533 - remove JDBC URL specific constructors from -core
git-svn-id:
Test case failure on oak-solr
Failed tests:
testOffsetAndLimit(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:1 but was:0
testOffsetAndLimitWithGetSize(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:2 but was:0
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:04 PM,
ignored the test for now (r1584015)
Tommaso
2014-04-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Test case failure on oak-solr
Failed tests:
testOffsetAndLimit(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:1 but was:0
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:25 AM, chet...@apache.org wrote:
+//TODO FIXME Temporary workaround for OAK-1666. Override the default
+//synchronized map with a Noop. This should be removed when fix
+//for JCR-3764 is part of release.
+inUse = new
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
The inUse map is in FileDataStore for a reason.
Ack. From what I have understood from Blob GC logic in Oak is that it
relies on blob last modified value to distinguish between active used
blobs. So for performing GC
Hi,
We've done a lot of stuff over the past two years and many parts of
Oak are already good enough for production use, so I think we should
start preparing for our 1.0 release.
Our original plan was to target for Jackrabbit 3.0 [1] but given the
problems we encountered [2] I think it would make
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith sm...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
would be nice to get an update on the roadmap of Oak.
Good point, and thanks for the reminder!
See [1] for suggested plan to Oak 1.0, and [2] for the bigger
Jackrabbit picture.
[1]
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #4000
Status: Passed
Duration: 2742 seconds
Commit: c692326301c4bc0f0cfe0db77eeeca5a90349255 (trunk)
Author: Michael Duerig
Message: OAK-1618: Implement noInternal from JackrabbitEventFilter
Add issue reference
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #4001
Status: Errored
Duration: 1940 seconds
Commit: 173ccf992e95c7151495fc3b6273f9af767cd73f (trunk)
Author: Jukka Zitting
Message: OAK-631: SegmentMK: Implement garbage collection
Use memory mapping to access
Hi,
There's an Oak and Jackrabbit-related developer event taking place next
Wednesday and Thursday in London.
AEMHub takes place on 9-10 April, and has a number of talks hopefully of
interest to the community, including:
- AEM's new architecture built upon Oak
- JCR nodes and polling importers
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #4007
Status: Fixed
Duration: 2472 seconds
Commit: 0ca8f0019394a74047e843a545d56f3985097bd2 (trunk)
Author: Jukka Zitting
Message: OAK-631: SegmentMK: Implement garbage collection
Remember to follow also the
Hi all,
after the last review feedback, I have revised the section on MicroKernels and
NodeStores.
I would appreciate any feedback if this new version is both technically correct
and also using the right terms.
The revised section is available here (User : review/Pwd: oak4502):
31 matches
Mail list logo
