[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.1

2014-10-17 Thread Davide Giannella
On 13/10/2014 16:45, Davide Giannella wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.1. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. The vote passes as follows: +1 Amit Jain +1 Davide Giannella

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.1 released

2014-10-17 Thread Davide Giannella
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.1 The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Introduction Jackrabbit Oak i

temporary instability of the 1.0 branch builds

2014-10-17 Thread Alex Parvulescu
Hi, I'm going through a large merge from trunk to 1.0 (the tarmk cold standy). I already finished merging everything but it was a really convoluted process so some of you may still experience some failures, things that I might have messed up/forgot. If you happen to notice anything off, please le

Re: temporary instability of the 1.0 branch builds

2014-10-17 Thread Angela Schreiber
hi alex i somehow had the impression that the 1.0 branch is just for fixes... does it really make sense to also merge new features into the branch? and doesn't this somehow defeat the purpose of keeping 1.0 stable while developing new stuff in the 'unstable' 1.1 branch aka trunk? kind regards an

Re: temporary instability of the 1.0 branch builds

2014-10-17 Thread Michael Marth
Hi Angela, you are totally correct with your impression that we keep the 1.0 branch for production issues or improvements that help debugging those. The TarMK cold standby is a bit of a border case of that (or you could say: an exception). There are quite a number of Oak users that consider TarM

Re: temporary instability of the 1.0 branch builds

2014-10-17 Thread Angela Schreiber
ok... thanks for the info. On 17/10/14 15:51, "Michael Marth" wrote: >Hi Angela, > >you are totally correct with your impression that we keep the 1.0 branch >for production issues or improvements that help debugging those. >The TarMK cold standby is a bit of a border case of that (or you could >

Cold Standby feature - the repo is not synchronizing

2014-10-17 Thread Kamil Ciecierski
Hello, I've got a problem with *syncmaster *and *syncslave *Oak run modes. I runned *syncmaster *mode and after this I runned *syncslave *but I wasn't receiving any information from both threads - it looked the both thread are hanged. So I connected with *jconsole* to *syncmaster *thread and check