On 2014-12-17 14:26, Amit Jain wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.9 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.9/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-o
On 17/12/2014 13:26, Amit Jain wrote:
> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.9
>
Davide
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.9
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Amit Jain wrote:
>
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.9 release is available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.9/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sou
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.9 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.9/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.9/
The SHA1 checksum of the archi
hi amit
sorry for the delay was busy elsewhere while running the
build with the merged changes.
it's committed in rev. 1646185
regards
angela
On 17/12/14 10:35, "Amit Jain" wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
>>
>> OAK-2350
>
>
>@ Angela
>Would it be ok to push this ou
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
>
> OAK-2350
@ Angela
Would it be ok to push this out to 1.0.10?
The silence on BUILDS-40 lead me to believe to be in the wrong place
there. Tried again with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8891.
Michael
On 10.12.14 3:49 , Michael Dürig wrote:
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-40
Michael
On 5.12.14 5:02 , Chetan Mehrotra wr
Thanks for spotting! Good to have people closely looking at the commits.
Fixed it in trunk and 1.0
Michael
On 17.12.14 9:29 , Julian Sedding wrote:
Hi Michael
I believe there's a typo in this commit. I don't know the larger
context, but from pure looks I would expect expect multiplication w
Hi Michael
I believe there's a typo in this commit. I don't know the larger
context, but from pure looks I would expect expect multiplication with
10 rather than addition. Can you please check? Thanks.
Regards
Julian
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:14 PM, wrote:
> Author: mduerig
> Date: Tue Dec 16
