[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.6

Hi, the vote passes as follows: +1 Amit Jain +1 Julian Reschke +1 Julian Sedding Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Marcel On 17/09/15 11:42, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: >A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.6 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.21

Hi, the vote passes as follows: +1 Amit Jain +1 Julian Reschke +1 Julian Sedding Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Marcel On 17/09/15 11:09, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: >A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.21 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6

Hi, the vote passes as follows: +1 Michael Dürig +1 Amit Jain +1 Marcel Reutegger Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Marcel On 14/09/15 11:19, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: >Hi, > >A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.6 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org

[Oak origin/1.2] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 432 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #432) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/432/ to view the results. Changes: [reschke] remve trailing whitespace [reschke] OAK-3425: Improve Docu

jackrabbit-oak build #6470: Errored

Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak - Build: #6470 Status: Errored Duration: 3003 seconds Commit: 1f718bac48eac57b9aac3f05365ef62e819ec918 (1.0) Author: Julian Reschke Message: OAK-3425: Improve DocumentNodeStore startup/shutdown diagnostics (ported to 1.0)

Re: svn commit: r1703758 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak-authorization-cug/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/spi/security/authorization/cug/impl/ oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak

Some updates on this topic. 2015-09-18 17:27 GMT+02:00 Francesco Mari : > Hi Angela, > > 2015-09-18 16:48 GMT+02:00 Angela Schreiber : >> hi francesco >> >> thanks a lot for taking care of this issue! very much appreciated. >> >> just a few comments: >> as just discussed in private required config

Re: issues ClusterNodeInfo (not) picking an existing entry on startup

On 2015-09-21 10:41, Marcel Reutegger wrote: Hi, On 17/09/15 18:48, "Julian Reschke" wrote: With the current assignment very weird things can happen, and I believe I see exactly this happening in a customer problem I'm investigating. The sequence is: 1) First system startup, cluster node id 1

Re: Question about the Oak Query Index

On 21/09/2015 09:11, Michael Lemler wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a question about the indexes in Oak. The documentation > (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/query.html) says that > "Oak does not index content by default as does Jackrabbit 2". But > later on in the part "Query Processing"

jackrabbit-oak build #6464: Fixed

Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak - Build: #6464 Status: Fixed Duration: 1525 seconds Commit: e2ca48dce166b4f5804b5c1fdbdc416c7eb2009a (trunk) Author: Julian Reschke Message: remve trailing whitespace, fix typos git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/as

Question about the Oak Query Index

Hi there, I have a question about the indexes in Oak. The documentation (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/query.html) says that "Oak does not index content by default as does Jackrabbit 2". But later on in the part "Query Processing" there is a part saying "By default, the followin

Re: issues ClusterNodeInfo (not) picking an existing entry on startup

On 2015-09-21 10:41, Marcel Reutegger wrote: Hi, On 17/09/15 18:48, "Julian Reschke" wrote: With the current assignment very weird things can happen, and I believe I see exactly this happening in a customer problem I'm investigating. The sequence is: 1) First system startup, cluster node id 1

Re: issues ClusterNodeInfo (not) picking an existing entry on startup

Hi, On 17/09/15 18:48, "Julian Reschke" wrote: >With the current assignment very weird things can happen, and I believe >I see exactly this happening in a customer problem I'm investigating. >The sequence is: > >1) First system startup, cluster node id 1 is assigned > >2) System crashes or was cra