[Oak origin/1.2] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 824 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #824) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/824/ to view the results. Changes: [catholicon] OAK-2754 - Use non unique PathCursor in

[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 823 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #823) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/823/ to view the results. Changes: [angela] minor improvement: security documentation [angela] minor

Re: Increase language level to Java 7

On 6.4.16 4:25 , Francesco Mari wrote: I was talking about trunk, of course. Developers working in areas where backports are the norm have to carefully consider if and when using Java 7 language features would be appropriate. New portions of the codebase could use of the new features freely.

Re: Increase language level to Java 7

I was talking about trunk, of course. Developers working in areas where backports are the norm have to carefully consider if and when using Java 7 language features would be appropriate. New portions of the codebase could use of the new features freely. 2016-04-06 16:19 GMT+02:00 Julian Reschke

RE: Jackrabbit 2.10 vs Oak 1.2.7

Hi Marcel, I uploaded all the source to github along with a summary spreadsheet. I would appreciate any time you have to review. https://github.com/Domenic-Ansys/Jackrabbit2-Oak-Tests As you stated the move is a non goal, but in comparison to Jackrabbit 2 I am also finding in my tests that

Re: Increase language level to Java 7

On 2016-04-06 14:27, Francesco Mari wrote: Hi all, some months ago we decided to drop support for Java 1.6 [1]. What about increasing the language level of the compiler so as to be able to use the new features in Java 7? [1]: http://jackrabbit.markmail.org/thread/t3gzwi25tcz6masg Well... for

Re: Increase language level to Java 7

+1 Best regards, Tomek -- Tomek Rękawek | Adobe Research | www.adobe.com reka...@adobe.com > On 06 Apr 2016, at 14:27, Francesco Mari wrote: > > Hi all, > > some months ago we decided to drop support for Java 1.6 [1]. What about > increasing the language level of

Increase language level to Java 7

Hi all, some months ago we decided to drop support for Java 1.6 [1]. What about increasing the language level of the compiler so as to be able to use the new features in Java 7? [1]: http://jackrabbit.markmail.org/thread/t3gzwi25tcz6masg