Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.14

2016-04-19 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Amit Jain wrote: > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.14 All checks ok Chetan Mehrotra

[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 843 - Still Failing

2016-04-19 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #843) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/843/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-4230: Remove unused JsopWriter in Commit

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.14

2016-04-19 Thread Amit Jain
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.14 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.2.14/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.2.14/ The SHA1 checksum of the

[Oak origin/1.4] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 842 - Still Failing

2016-04-19 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #842) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/842/ to view the results. Changes: [dj] OAK-4235 - Backport OAK-4003 to 1.4 branch Test

Re: Jackrabbit 2.10 vs Oak 1.2.7

2016-04-19 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Domenic I apologize for the late reply, but now I finally had time to look at your test. The reason why Oak on MongoDB is so slow with your test is the write concern that your test specifies when it constructs the DocumentNodeStore. The test sets it to FSYNCED. This is an appropriate write

Oak 1.5.2 release plan

2016-04-19 Thread Davide Giannella
Hello team, to better acommodate https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3348 I proactively decided to postpone the release of 1.5.2 by 2 weeks to the 9th of May rather than next Monday. Any objections please say it. Cheers Davide

Heads up, humps ahead: merge of big patch for OAK-3348

2016-04-19 Thread Michael Dürig
Hi, After weeks of testing we are finally in a position to go forward with a fix for OAK-3348 [1]. This is a prerequisite for the segment store revision gc. The amount of changes required for this fix is quite big and there will still be a couple of loose ends to knot once applied. Most