Re: Property index replacement / evolution

2016-08-07 Thread Ian Boston
Hi, For TarMK, none of this is an issue as TarMK is all in memory on 1 JVM with local disk. Scaling up by throwing RAM and IO at the problem is a viable option, as far as it's safe/sensible to do so. But TarMK doesn't cluster, and if it did cluster, this would probably be an issue. I think, but co

Re: Property index replacement / evolution

2016-08-07 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
Would add one more 4. Write throughput degradation - For non unique property index which make use of ContentMirrorStoreStrategy we have seen a loss in throughput due to contention which arise due to conflicts while entries are made in index. (OAK-2673, OAK-3380) Chetan Mehrotra On Fri, Aug 5,