hi chetan
i don't really see the problem with the big amount of issues inside the
'core' module.
on a regular basis i look at unassigned issues and those without a
component to see if there is anything in there that i missed.
from a consumer point of view though i see a lot of benefit of having t
Not sure if we should have a 1-1 mapping between JIRA Component and
Module at svn level. We can create logical components and later align
them as and when new modules are carved out. If required JIRA
components can be merged and renamed easily.
As said having specific JIRA component for some logic
Hello guys, I'm currently assessing Oak as an alternative for content
management on my cloud product. However, I already have a Cassandra cluster
as the main persistence technology and to go additionally with Mongo would
turn out in more complexity in terms of manteinance and support.
So, have you
On 2017-03-28 14:33, Dominique Jaeggi wrote:
...
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38
Best regards, Julian
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38
all checks pass.
Regards,
Tommaso
Il giorno mar 28 mar 2017 alle ore 15:13 Alex Parvulescu <
alex.parvule...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38
>
> all checks ok,
>
> alex
>
>
> On Tue
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38
all checks ok,
alex
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Dominique Jaeggi wrote:
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38 release is available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.38/
>
> The release
Hi,
I wasn’t aware that “releasing independently” is an option, and maybe even
desired for future modules. This is currently proposed on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4933.
If you have input on how to make it successful, please add your input there
(I’d be interested in the lessons
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.38/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.38/
The SHA1 checksum of the arc
Hi Francesco,
do you have other indexes within your Oak repo ?
It might be that the query engine selects a different index which only acts
on [nt:file] nodes.
You can try checking the plan [1] for your query and compare with the
[nt:base] version.
It might also be useful to enable debug logging
fo
We have wrapped oak jcr implementation with our data model, so it's not so easy
give you our unit test (our sw is not yet open sourece :-))
Besides we know the documenti is correctly indexed, cause we see it in solr; so
you can use any type of pdf: oak manage full text correctly.
Anyway we tri
i was about to write pretty much the same thing :-)
regards
angela
On 28/03/17 09:09, "Michael Dürig" wrote:
>
>As this is a new feature I would be interested in the motivation for
>having to backport this. Generally we should only backport fixes for
>defects.
>
>As Marcel mentions on the issue
Hi Francesco,
Il giorno lun 27 mar 2017 alle ore 08:59 Ancona Francesco <
francesco.anc...@siav.it> ha scritto:
Sorry.
We are using Oak 1.4.10 and solr 4.10.4
i send you also a pdf example: the searched word is "sezione"
attachments do not usually get through the mailing list therefore we can
hi chetan
On 24/03/17 07:11, "Chetan Mehrotra" wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Angela Schreiber
>wrote:
>> i have been working on should already
>> be included in the documentation because i try to do that before i
>>resolve
>> the issue.
>
>Thats much better! What we can do is mark
As this is a new feature I would be interested in the motivation for
having to backport this. Generally we should only backport fixes for
defects.
As Marcel mentions on the issue a better approach would be to release
this independently. If this is blocked by dependencies we should make an
e
i agree with marcel.
in general i would rather move forward with the modularisation and then
adjust jira accordingly.
kind regards
angela
On 27/03/17 09:26, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm wondering if this is the best approach. Initially we used the JIRA
>component 1:1 for modules we hav
15 matches
Mail list logo
