[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit 2.17.0 released

2017-12-21 Thread Julian Reschke
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit 2.17.0 The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit -- Version

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14

2017-12-21 Thread Michael Dürig
On 20.12.17 18:46, Davide Giannella wrote: [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14 Michael

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14

2017-12-21 Thread Davide Giannella
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14 D.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14

2017-12-21 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 20/12/17 18:46, Davide Giannella wrote: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14. The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14

2017-12-21 Thread Andrei Dulceanu
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.14 where INFO] [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; 2017-10-18T10:58:13+03:00) [INFO] OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.13.2", arch: "x

Intent to backport OAK-5317

2017-12-21 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'd like to backport OAK-5317 to the maintenance branches. It is an improvement, but would allow users to run a DocumentNodeStore on more recent MongoDB version. I consider the change low risk, because the index is there anyway. Regards Marcel

Re: Intent to backport OAK-5317

2017-12-21 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
+1 Chetan Mehrotra On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to backport OAK-5317 to the maintenance branches. It is an > improvement, but would allow users to run a DocumentNodeStore on more recent > MongoDB version. I consider the change low risk, because th

Re: Experimental build for Oak on Windows

2017-12-21 Thread Robert Munteanu
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 13:48 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote: > I'll keep it alive for a couple of weeks to assess its stability, and > then we can discuss whether we want to promote it to a 'proper' job > that we actually pay attention to and that sends notifications. The builds have started failing

[windows] Jenkins test failure - o.a.j.o.index.indexer.document.flatfile.FlatFileStoreTest.basicTest

2017-12-21 Thread Robert Munteanu
Hi, The org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.index.indexer.document.flatfile.FlatFileStore Test.basicTest has failed for the past 2 runs on the Windows build job: https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit-Oak-Windows/lastBuild/org.apac he.jackrabbit$oak- run/testReport/org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.index.indexer

Re: [windows] Jenkins test failure - o.a.j.o.index.indexer.document.flatfile.FlatFileStoreTest.basicTest

2017-12-21 Thread Vikas Saurabh
Hi Robert, > I am not able to qualify whether this is a valid failure or not, > therefore I'm bringing it to the mailing list. > That should be independent of OS... for me, following failed: MAVEN_OPTS='-Xmx512m -Xms512m' mvn test -pl :oak-run -Dtest=FlatFileStoreTest#basicTest Opened OAK-7108 an