Re: [PR] OAK-10843 : exclude a flaky test combination [jackrabbit-oak]

2024-06-24 Thread Arun Ram
Ccscsce@÷@÷e@ ÷se""÷csse,,ec,scce,se,cse,se,se,cse,csse,ccsce,ssse,cssce,se,csce,scce,e,cscc,sce,csccssess@ ÷÷@@ßeéwrŕrrrŕ On Mon, 24 Jun, 2024, 19:00 stefan-egli (via GitHub), wrote: > > stef

Re: Removing a version does not remove associated labels

2022-09-05 Thread Arun Ram
> Am 30.08.2022 um 09:28 schrieb Marcel Reutegger: > > Hi Arun, > > > > On 29.08.22, 09:05, "Arun Ram" wrote: > >> I have checked the classic jackrabbit . Here i dont see the problem. > >> In classic jackrabbit InternalVersionHistoryImpl[1] re

Re: Removing a version does not remove associated labels

2022-08-29 Thread Arun Ram
Hi Marcel, > This also sounds reasonable. Did you check the behaviour of classic > Jackrabbit? I think it would be good to have consistent behaviour for > classic Jackrabbit and Oak. I have checked the classic jackrabbit . Here i dont see the problem. In classic jackrabbit InternalVersionHistoryIm

Removing a version does not remove associated labels

2022-08-25 Thread Arun Ram
Hi All, We have encountered a behavior of versionStorage and versionLabels which I think is bug. *Current behavior:* 1. Create a node and make it *versionable* 2. Now create more than two versions (for example two version is *1.0* and *1.1* respectively) 3. Now add label at versio