Re: New Jackrabbit Committer: Nitin Gupta

Welcome to the team Nitin! Regards, Tommaso On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 08:31, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > Hi, > > Please welcome Nitin Gupta as a new committer and PMC member of > the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to > offer Nitin committership based on his contributio

Re: New Jackrabbit Committer: Mohit Kataria

Welcome to the team Mohit! Regards, Tommaso On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 08:33, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > Hi, > > Please welcome Mohit Kataria as a new committer and PMC member of > the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to > offer Mohit committership based on his contribut

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.25

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.25 Tommaso On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 16:27, Davide Giannella wrote: > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.25 > D. >

Re: Intent to backport OAK-8235

thanks for the feedback Davide and Julian, in summary I share your same concerns and therefore I don't have a good solution myself. For now I've only backported it to the "safe" branches. I'm thinking of backporting the previous upgrade to Solr 5.5.5 to branch 1.6, which would be JDK 1.7 compatible

Intent to backport OAK-8235

Hi all, I'd like to backport OAK-8235 to branch 1.10, 1.8 and 1.6. For branch 1.10 and 1.8 everything should be just fine, however for 1.6 we had set our java compatibility to JDK 1.7, however Solr 6.6.6 requires at least JDK 1.8. In most cases I s

Intent to backport OAK-8118 and OAK-8819 to the 1.8 branch

Hi all, If no one objects, I'd like to backport OAK-8118 [1] and OAK-8819 [2] to the 1.8 branch. Regards, Tommaso [1] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8118 [2] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8119

intento to backport OAK-8118 to branch 1.10

Hi all, I'd like to backport OAK-8118 [1] to branch 1.10. Regards, Tommaso [1] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8118

intent to backport OAK-8072

Hi all, I'd like to backport OAK-8072 [1] to 1.10 and 1.8 branches, if there's no objection. Regards, Tommaso [1] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8072

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.0

alle ore 17:43 Tommaso Teofili ha scritto: > > see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7983 > > Il giorno gio 10 gen 2019 alle ore 17:38 Tommaso Teofili > ha scritto: > > > > while doing testing with trunk me and others have found out that the > > change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.0

see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7983 Il giorno gio 10 gen 2019 alle ore 17:38 Tommaso Teofili ha scritto: > > while doing testing with trunk me and others have found out that the > changes for OAK-7947 can cause a NPE in case > LucenePropertyIndex#getIndexNode

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.0

while doing testing with trunk me and others have found out that the changes for OAK-7947 can cause a NPE in case LucenePropertyIndex#getIndexNode return null, therefore I think this needs to be fixed before releasing 1.10.0, hence my -1. I'll create an Oak issue right away. Regards, Tommaso Il g

Re: [Monitoring] - Provisioning StatisticsProvider in Oak

but in the end (hopefully) better in terms of code quality / testability / etc. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 11:43 Robert Munteanu ha scritto: > > On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 11:34 +0100, Francesco Mari wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 11:45, Tommaso Teofili < &

Re: [Monitoring] - Provisioning StatisticsProvider in Oak

p.s.: [1] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7904?focusedCommentId=16697298&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16697298 Il giorno mar 27 nov 2018 alle ore 11:38 Tommaso Teofili ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > since a few days I

[Monitoring] - Provisioning StatisticsProvider in Oak

Hi all, since a few days I'm trying to capture some simple stats on the Oak query engine and I'm struggling with instrumenting the StatisticsProvider which is used to update MeterStats and the likes. While everything has gone smoothly on the indexing side as obtaining a StatisticsProvider was as

Re: Backporting similarity search to Oak 1.8

+1, the patch looks good to me. Tommaso Il giorno mer 19 set 2018 alle ore 22:33 Matt Ryan ha scritto: > > Hi oak-dev, > > I’ve just created OAK-7769 in which I would like us to consider backporting > the similarity search feature that Tommaso implemented in OAK-7575 to Oak > 1.8. There is a pat

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OAK-7764) Build Jackrabbit Oak #1654 failed

this should be fixed in r1841328. Il giorno mer 19 set 2018 alle ore 14:49 Hudson (JIRA) ha scritto: > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16620533#comment-16620533 > ] > > Hudson commen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.22

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 26 giu 2018 alle ore 10:50 Alex Deparvu ha scritto: > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.22 > > [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; > 2017-10-18T09:58:13+02:00) > [INFO] OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.13.5", arch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.12

+1 all checks ok, svn tag build ok. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mar 29 mag 2018 alle ore 10:12 Marcel Reutegger ha scritto: > On 28.05.18 16:42, Manfred Baedke wrote: > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.12. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.9.2

+1 all checks ok, svn tag build passes. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 21 mag 2018 alle ore 17:20 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2018-05-21 15:55, Davide Giannella wrote: > > ... > > [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.9.2 > > ...where... > > > [INFO]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.11

+1, all checks ok Tommaso Il giorno mer 4 apr 2018 alle ore 10:10 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2018-04-04 08:16, Amit Jain wrote: > > ... > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.11 > > ...where... > > > [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec65

oak-search module

Hi all, In the context of creating an (abstract) implementation for Oak full text indexes [1], I'd like to create a new module called _oak-search_. Such module will contain: - implementation agnostic utilities for full text search (e.g. aggregation utilities) - implementation agnostic SPIs to be e

Re: Azure Segment Store

Hi Tomek, While I think it's an interesting feature, I'd be also interested to hear about the user story behind your prototype. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 1 mar 2018 alle ore 10:31 Tomek Rękawek ha scritto: > Hello, > > I prepared a prototype for the Azure-based Segment Store, which allow

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.9

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mer 7 feb 2018 alle ore 14:44 Alex Deparvu ha scritto: > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.9 > > alex > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Davide Giannella > wrote: > > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.9 release is available at: > > > > ht

Re: svn commit: r1822884 [1/3] - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.6: ./ oak-parent/ oak-solr-core/ oak-solr-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/solr/configuration/ oak-solr-core/sr

yes, unfortunately I didn't catch that, sorry for the inconvenience. I'm OOO today, however it should be fixed now. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mar 6 feb 2018 alle ore 12:41 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2018-02-06 12:30, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 2018-02-06 10:50,

Re: adaptTo() 2018: Tickets now available / Start Call for Papers

sorry, I meant to write Stefan, not Sebastian, of course. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 1 feb 2018 alle ore 17:52 Tommaso Teofili < tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi Sebastian, > > here's my feedback: 599€ as an early bird price sounds crazy and it's all &

Re: adaptTo() 2018: Tickets now available / Start Call for Papers

Hi Sebastian, here's my feedback: 599€ as an early bird price sounds crazy and it's all but inclusive for people not being backed by companies willing to pay the conference. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 1 feb 2018 alle ore 15:57 Stefan Seifert < sseif...@pro-vision.de> ha scritto: > Dear adap

intent to backport OAK-4318 to branch 1.6

Hi all, I'd like to backport upgrade to Solr 5.5.5 (OAK-4318) to branch 1.6. Regards, Tommaso

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.0

+1 build and sigs ok Tommaso Il giorno mar 9 gen 2018 alle ore 14:05 Robert Munteanu ha scritto: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 11:53 +, Davide Giannella wrote: > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.0. > > +1 > > > [INFO] >

intento to backport OAK-4055 to branch 1.2

Hi all, I'd like to backport OAK-4055 [1] to branch 1.2 to make it possible to use a Solr index for a subtree instead of for the whole repository. Regards, Tommaso [1] : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4055

Re: Build failure due to out of heap in oak-solr

thanks Michael, now I should be able to reproduce it by manually setting the max heap to 512M. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno ven 15 dic 2017 alle ore 12:52 Michael Dürig ha scritto: > > > On 15.12.17 12:41, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 15:18 +0530, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > >>>

Re: svn commit: r1818056 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-solr-core/src/test/resources/solr/oak/conf/solrconfig.xml

thanks, you've been faster than me :) Il giorno mer 13 dic 2017 alle ore 20:22 ha scritto: > Author: rombert > Date: Wed Dec 13 19:22:28 2017 > New Revision: 1818056 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1818056&view=rev > Log: > OAK-4138 - Upgrade oak-solr to Solr 5.x > > Fix syntax error i

Re: Experimental build for Oak on Windows

+1 thanks Robert, I had the same experience Michael had a while back. Also to me it looked like many test failures were false negatives, but it may well be that some tests fail reliably on Windows and I didn't notice that. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 7 dic 2017 alle ore 09:11 Michael Dürig h

Re: svn commit: r1816834 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-benchmarks: pom.xml src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/benchmark/FullTextSolrSearchTest.java

thanks Amit! Il giorno ven 1 dic 2017 alle ore 12:15 ha scritto: > Author: amitj > Date: Fri Dec 1 11:15:23 2017 > New Revision: 1816834 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1816834&view=rev > Log: > OAK-4318: Upgrade oak-solr to Solr 5.x > > - Tentatively fixed with updating solr-core dep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.7

+1, all checks ok Tommaso Il giorno mar 28 nov 2017 alle ore 11:12 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2017-11-28 10:15, Davide Giannella wrote: > > ... > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.7 > > Where: > > > [INFO] Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.6

+1 all checks ok Tommaso Il giorno mar 31 ott 2017 alle ore 10:28 Amit Jain ha scritto: > +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.6 > > Thanks > Amit > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Davide Giannella > wrote: > > > > > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.6 release is ava

Re: svn commit: r1813193 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/IndexDefinition.java

ok, it's anyway a temporary thing for the sake of testing but I agree with your suggestion, I'll change the property name. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mer 25 ott 2017 alle ore 15:38 Chetan Mehrotra < chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > +String mmp = System.getProperty("cmmp"); > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.10

+1 all checks ok. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mar 24 ott 2017 alle ore 17:41 Vikas Saurabh < vikas.saur...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Davide Giannella > wrote: > > > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.10 > > Thanks, > Vikas >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.15.7

+1, all checks ok Tommaso Il giorno mar 24 ott 2017 alle ore 17:09 Vikas Saurabh < vikas.saur...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Julian Reschke > wrote: > > > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.15.7 > > Thanks, > Vikas >

Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0

+1 it makes sense. Tommaso Il giorno ven 13 ott 2017 alle ore 17:01 Matt Ryan ha scritto: > Hi, > > Makes good sense to me. Cutting the next release as a major version > reflects the high amount of change in dependencies that the downstream > should expect. > > -MR > > > On October 13, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.8

+1 Il giorno lun 25 set 2017 alle ore 22:53 Robert Munteanu ha scritto: > On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 21:15 +0100, Davide Giannella wrote: > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.8. > > +1 > > Robert

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 12 set 2017 alle ore 10:50 Robert Munteanu ha scritto: > On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 14:12 +0100, Davide Giannella wrote: > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.7. > > +1 > > Robert

Re: OAK-6575 - A word of caution

thanks Ian for taking care of including all the provided feedback, I finally managed to review the patches and it looks very good now as it sounds simpler and more inline with the overall Oak design. Thanks again, Tommaso Il giorno gio 7 set 2017 alle ore 16:39 Ian Boston ha scritto: > On 7 S

Re: OAK-6575 - A word of caution

I share Francesco's concerns, the same way I shared them when we first discussed this way back; I tried to express my doubts on the current proposal in the email thread for OAK-6575 (linked also in Francesco's email), which got ignored; that's fine as long as the majority of us is happy with the cu

Re: OAK-4348 - intent to add oak-lucene-mt

ext of OAK-3336 though, in the meantime I'll change the module name into oak-search-mt. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno ven 25 ago 2017 alle ore 10:02 Tommaso Teofili < tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > yes, of course it can work the same way with the Solr index, pro

Re: OAK-4348 - intent to add oak-lucene-mt

can possibly be used for Solr also (if we > generalize FulltextQueryTermsProvider concept). If yes then we can > name the module as oak-search-mt > Chetan Mehrotra > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > as part of OA

OAK-4348 - intent to add oak-lucene-mt

Hi all, as part of OAK-4348 [1] some time ago I had developed an extension in oak-lucene to expand search terms using machine translated term, in order to provide cross language search capabilities to Oak (via FulltextQueryTermsProvider API [2]). In the context of a better modularized Oak, I was t

Re: OAK-6575 - Provide a secure external URL to a DataStore binary.

Il giorno gio 24 ago 2017 alle ore 10:16 Michael Dürig ha scritto: > > > On 24.08.17 09:27, Ian Boston wrote: > > On 24 August 2017 at 08:18, Michael Dürig wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> URI uri = ((OakValueFactory) valueFactory).getSignedURI(binProp); > >> > >> > > +1 > > > > One point > > Users in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.6

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 22 ago 2017 alle ore 10:48 Michael Dürig ha scritto: > > > On 22.08.17 08:52, Amit Jain wrote: > > [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.6 > > +1 > > Michael >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.5

+1 Tommaso Il giorno lun 31 lug 2017 alle ore 17:05 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2017-07-31 15:43, Davide Giannella wrote: > > ... > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.5 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.17

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 18 lug 2017 alle ore 13:29 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2017-07-17 13:00, Davide Giannella wrote: > > ... > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.17 > > Best regards, Julian >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.4

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mer 19 lug 2017 alle ore 14:18 Andrei Dulceanu < andrei.dulce...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.4 > > Regards, > Andrei > > 2017-07-19 14:00 GMT+03:00 Davide Giannella : > > > > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.4 rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3

+1 Tommaso Il giorno lun 3 lug 2017 alle ore 17:20 Alex Deparvu ha scritto: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Davide Giannella > wrote: > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3 release is available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.7.3/ > > > >

Re: [DiSCUSS] - highly vs rarely used data

I am sure there are both use cases for automatic vs manual/controlled collection of unused data, however if I were a user I would personally not want to care about this. While I'd be happy to know that my repo is faster / smaller / cleaner / whatever it'd sound overly complex to deal with JCR and O

[DiSCUSS] - highly vs rarely used data

Hi all, recently I've been at a conference [1] where I attended an interesting keynote about data management [2] (I think it refers to this 2016 paper [3]). Apart from the approaches proposed to solve the data management problem (e.g. get rid of DBMSs!) I got interested in the discussion about ho

backporting OAK-6317 until 1.2 branch

Hi all, I'd like to backport the fix for a bug in LMSEstimator [1] (LMSEstimator is used by oak-solr-core to estimate the no. of entries in the index without issuing a query to Solr) until branch 1.2 (as it was observed on a 1.2.x Oak instance). Regards, Tommaso [1] : https://issues.apache.org/j

Re: Oak indexes

that I should be adding to the > classpath? Thanks! > > Greetings > Roy > > On 8 May 2017, at 15:07, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > > > Hi Roy, > > > > if you have copy on read enabled (it is by default) for the Oak Lucene > > index you should be able to take

Re: Oak indexes

Hi Roy, if you have copy on read enabled (it is by default) for the Oak Lucene index you should be able to take the index at their paths on the file systems and use Luke as per any other Lucene index (btw Oak is currently using Lucene 4.7.1). Hope it helps, Tommaso [1] : http://jackrabbit.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.25

+1, all checks ok. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mar 11 apr 2017 alle ore 11:30 Marcel Reutegger < mreut...@adobe.com> ha scritto: > On 11/04/17 07:51, Amit Jain wrote: > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.25. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes i

Re: [m12n] remove oak-core dep in oak-blob-*

eutegg/jackrabbit-oak/tree/m12n > but please note that it is still heavily under construction... basically > we just want to see how far we get with some limited effort. > > angela > > > > > On 06/04/17 15:09, "Davide Giannella" wrote: > > >On 06/04/2017 1

[m12n] remove oak-core dep in oak-blob-*

Hi all, as part of refactoring and making more appropriate interdependencies I think it'd be good if we could have that oak-blob-* modules depend on just oak-blob (and eventually oak-commons / oak-base) and cut their dependency to oak-core so that they would only rely on the purposely exposed blob

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38 all checks pass. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mar 28 mar 2017 alle ore 15:13 Alex Parvulescu < alex.parvule...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.38 > > all checks ok, > > alex > > > On Tue

Re: problem on oak jcr sql2 query

aw that index planner doesn't permit solr query (oak doesn't use > solr for the query). So we can't find words inside content (nt:resource) > > What is wrong ? > Why oak doesn't use solr for full text query ? > > Thanks in advance, > best regards > > -Me

Re: problem on oak jcr sql2 query

d skip some docs you don't really need. If you can provide the PDF via a link or, better, a unit test we can probably help you more effectively. Regards, Tommaso Thanks in advance, best regards -Messaggio originale- Da: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com] I

Re: problem on oak jcr sql2 query

It'd be helpful to also know the version of Oak and Solr you're using and, possibly, sample content you expect the query to match. Thanks, Tommaso Il giorno ven 24 mar 2017 alle ore 14:54 Thomas Mueller ha scritto: > Could you post the index definition please? > > > From: Ancona Francesco > R

Re: Merge policy for the 1.6 branch

y to miss something > by just following @commits. > > Michael > > On 14.03.17 12:07, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > I have one concern: is such a backport policy meant to be time boxed > (e.g. > > keep it for first N 1.6.x releases)? > > I am asking this because I'

Re: Merge policy for the 1.6 branch

I have one concern: is such a backport policy meant to be time boxed (e.g. keep it for first N 1.6.x releases)? I am asking this because I'm wondering if we want to establish this policy for all backports (1.4, 1.2, 1.0 branches too), or alternatively we aim to be a bit conservative in the first mo

Re: Release plan Oak 1.4.13

Done already, thanks Davide Il giorno lun 6 feb 2017 alle 22:50 Davide Giannella ha scritto: > On 06/02/2017 07:22, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > I've backported those issues, thanks Amit for having waited for me. > > Do we have to have those in 1.6.1 as well or where they fixed

Re: Release plan Oak 1.4.13

I've backported those issues, thanks Amit for having waited for me. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 6 feb 2017 alle ore 11:23 Tommaso Teofili < tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > thanks a lot Amit, sounds good > > Regards, > Tommaso > > Il giorno lun 6 feb 2017

Re: Release plan Oak 1.4.13

> Amit > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > > yes, I should be able to fix them by that date. > > > > Thanks, > > Tommaso > > > > Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle ore 11:56 Davide Giannella < > > dav...@apache

Re: Release plan Oak 1.4.13

yes, I should be able to fix them by that date. Thanks, Tommaso Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle ore 11:56 Davide Giannella ha scritto: > On 03/02/2017 03:41, Amit Jain wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > Oak 1.4.13 release is scheduled for Monday (6th February) as planned. If > > there's something that n

Re: Hybrid indexing and soft commits.

+1 Tommaso Il giorno ven 18 nov 2016 alle ore 11:06 Ian Boston ha scritto: > Hi, > IIUC the Hybrid indexing on the master operates in parallel with the master > index writer, performing the same task but repeatedly throwing its work > away when the master provides an update. IIUC, it effectivel

Re: RIP Apache Jenkins!?

sorry but I disagree, while Adobe can have its internal infrastructure run whatever kind of tests, I think Oak should have its own continuous build working on the ASF infra, if anything needs to be adjusted we can get in touch with infra@. Other than that I am sorry I could not spend more time on C

Re: segment-tar depending on oak-core

Il giorno ven 21 ott 2016 alle ore 16:08 Thomas Mueller ha scritto: > Hi, > > >The release process in Oak is a joke. > > I don't think it's a joke. > > > Releasing every two weeks by > >using version numbers as counters just for the sake of it is > >embarrassing. > > Why? It's simple. > > > I don

Re: OAK/AEM-SOLR indexing

Hi Sri, in this mailing list we only discuss development concerns that relate to pure Oak, AEM specific questions should go through other (Adobe) channels. The current way Solr index can filter content is by whitelisting / blacklisting properties [1]; that is you compile a list of properties (whit

Re: [VOTE] Require JDK7 for Oak 1.4

+1 Tommaso Il giorno lun 19 set 2016 alle ore 10:19 Amit Jain ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks > Amit > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Chetan Mehrotra < > chetan.mehro...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > +1 > > Chetan Mehrotra > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Marcel Reutegger > > wrote:

Faster reference binary handling

Hi all, while working with Oak S3 DS I have witnessed slowness (no numbers, just 'slow' from a user perspective) in persisting a binary using its reference; although this may be related to some environment specific issue I wondered about the reference binary handling we introduced in JCR-3534 [1].

Re: OAK SOLR re-index via index manager UI

Hi Sri, Index Manager is not part of Apache Jackrabbit Oak, so this is not the proper channel to get answers on that topic. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mer 20 lug 2016 alle ore 11:54 sri vaths ha scritto: > Hi,We are not able to see the solr index for an re-index trigger via AEM > 6.1 tools UI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.17

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 12 lug 2016 alle ore 07:00 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2016-07-11 07:16, Amit Jain wrote: > > ... > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.17 > > Best regards, Julian >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.32

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 12 lug 2016 alle ore 08:46 Alex Parvulescu < alex.parvule...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.32 > > alex > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Dominique Jaeggi wrote: > > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.32 relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak Segment Tar version 0.0.4

+1 Tommaso Il giorno lun 11 lug 2016 alle ore 19:09 Alex Parvulescu < alex.parvule...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > [X] +1 Approve the release > > alex > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Francesco Mari > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 3 issues in this release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jir

Re: Starting the embedded Solr server in Oak

Il giorno ven 1 lug 2016 alle ore 08:49 Banerjee, Soumya J < soumya.j.baner...@in.tesco.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > > I am facing a problem in getting started with embedded Solr server in *Oak > v1.4.1* (that is bundled as part Oak). I understand that the embedded > Solr server is started in-memory w

Re: svn commit: r1750809 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/LucenePropertyIndex.java

sure. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 30 giu 2016 alle ore 17:45 Chetan Mehrotra < chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi Tommaso, > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:20 PM, wrote: > > Modified: > > > > jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucen

Re: svn commit: r1748675 - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.2: ./ oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/ oak-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4524 Tommaso Il giorno gio 30 giu 2016 alle ore 10:33 Tommaso Teofili < tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > thanks, since OAK-4499 is closed I'll create a new one. > > Regards, > Tommaso > > Il giorno mer 29 giu 2016

Re: svn commit: r1748675 - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.2: ./ oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/ oak-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index

thanks, since OAK-4499 is closed I'll create a new one. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mer 29 giu 2016 alle ore 08:14 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2016-06-23 14:35, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > fixed in OAK-4499, I'll have a look if

Re: svn commit: r1748675 - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.2: ./ oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/ oak-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index

fixed in OAK-4499, I'll have a look if Jenkins keeps complaining. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 23 giu 2016 alle ore 12:49 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2016-06-22 23:27, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > right, I will have a look tomorrow. > > &g

Re: svn commit: r1748675 - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.2: ./ oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/ oak-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index

right, I will have a look tomorrow. Tommaso Il giorno mer 22 giu 2016 alle ore 16:54 Julian Reschke < julian.resc...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > On 2016-06-16 12:00, tomm...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: tommaso > > Date: Thu Jun 16 10:00:24 2016 > > New Revision: 1748675 > > > > URL: http://svn.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak Segment Tar version 0.0.2

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mer 22 giu 2016 alle ore 15:40 Alex Parvulescu < alex.parvule...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > [X] +1 Approve the release > > ran the script and it did not complain. > it doesn't look like it's running any sort of build and I think there's > value in doing that, but I don't cons

Re: CI builds on Windows

I'm for option 2 too! Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 9 giu 2016 alle ore 18:03 Davide Giannella ha scritto: > On 08/06/2016 08:33, Michael Dürig wrote: > > 2. Try to enable it again and involve with the Apache infra team to > > see what options we have to speed things up > I'm for option 2. As

Re: API proposal for - Expose URL for Blob source (OAK-1963)

+1 to Francesco's concerns, exposing the location of a binary at the application level doesn't sound good from a security perspective. To me sounds like breaching the JCR and NodeState layers to directly manipulate NodeStore binaries (from the DataStore), e.g. to perform smart replication across di

Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

oak-segment-store +1 Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 25 apr 2016 alle ore 16:52 Vikas Saurabh < vikas.saur...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > oak-embedded-store +1 > > > Thanks, > Vikas >

Re: OAK +Remote SOLR OOTB integration queries

Hi Sri, what are you trying to achieve? Here’s some notes inline: > On 23 Mar 2016, at 09:50, sri vaths wrote: > > Hi All, > As in here http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/solr.html > Trying use remote SOLR with OAKa > Need to know if these are supported > 1) How to control Indexing chi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 (take 2)

same here, hence -1 (or $my.vote -=2) Regards, Tommaso Il giorno ven 4 mar 2016 alle ore 05:29 Amit Jain ha scritto: > Based on Marcel's recommendation, changing my vote to -1. > > Thanks > Amit > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Marcel Reutegger > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > meanwhile I created

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 (take 2)

+1 Tommaso Il giorno gio 3 mar 2016 alle ore 09:47 Marcel Reutegger ha scritto: > Hi, > > On 02/03/16 17:34, "Davide Giannella" wrote: > >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0. > >The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > >least three

Re: [Blocked] Re: Oak 1.3.17/1.4.0 release plan

as far as I know Vikas is working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4066 and the fix should get pushed shortly. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 29 feb 2016 alle ore 15:16 Davide Giannella ha scritto: > On 29/02/2016 12:24, Davide Giannella wrote: > > On 29/02/2016 10:22

Re: Oak 1.3.17/1.4.0 release plan

I've fixed OAK-4068 related error (in IndexDefinitionTest). Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 29 feb 2016 alle ore 11:22 Tommaso Teofili < tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > and > > OAK-4039 > > Il giorno lun 29 feb 2016 alle ore 11:10 Marcel Reutegger < >

Re: Oak 1.3.17/1.4.0 release plan

and OAK-4039 Il giorno lun 29 feb 2016 alle ore 11:10 Marcel Reutegger < mreut...@adobe.com> ha scritto: > trunk is currently broken. see: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4068 > > > regards > marcel > > On 29/02/16 10:41, "Davide Giannella" wrote: > > >Team, a quick update on the

Re: [Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 764 - Still Failing

it seems we're having lots of test errors due to OOM ... we should try to see if it's a Jenkins issue (low resources) or an Oak bug. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno gio 25 feb 2016 alle ore 06:02 Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> ha scritto: > The Apache Jenkins build system has buil

Re: [Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 634 - Still Failing

can you guys reproduce locally? I seem I cannot... Tommaso 2015-12-17 7:01 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra : > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Apache Jenkins Server > wrote: > > Stack Trace: > > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected: (1), oh hallo (1)], text:[hallo (1), hello (1), oh hallo (1)

Re: [Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 630 - Still Failing

I was checking myself too, and it doesn't fail for me locally with a fresh checkout ... I'll dig more into it. Tommaso 2015-12-16 14:32 GMT+01:00 Michael Dürig : > > org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.FacetTest consistently fails on > Jenkins now. Is this related to any recent changes? > > Mic

Re: svn commit: r1720106 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/query: QueryImpl.java SQL2Parser.java ast/AstElementFactory.java ast/FacetColumnImpl.java ast/Selec

it should be ok now, sorry for the noise. Tommaso 2015-12-15 13:25 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili : > thanks, I'll have a look. > > Tommaso > > 2015-12-15 13:12 GMT+01:00 Davide Giannella : > >> This commit breaks the build. >> >> Tommaso could you please h

  1   2   3   >