Hi,
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.0/
The SHA1 checksum of t
On 9.5.14 4:07 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Michael
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
I'm replying to Michael's email as I did not receive the original
announcement email.
alex
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
>
> On 9.5.14 4:07 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>>
>> [X] +1 Release this package as
On 2014-05-09 04:07, Jukka Zitting wrote:
...
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Best regards, Julian
> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Davide
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
All tests passed and All checks ok.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Davide Giannella
wrote:
>> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
> Davide
>
>
>
Hi,
>Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0.
>The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
All checks OK.
Regards
Marcel
Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the
jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deployments?
On 9 May 2014 12:07, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0 release is available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabb
Hi,
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Please note I had to run the tests twice. In the first run, I got:
Results :
Failed tests:
addReferences[2](org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ConcurrentAddReferenceTest):
javax.jcr.RepositoryException: OakOak0001: Failed to merge changes
Hi,
Thanks all who voted so far! Since the recent email outage delayed the
delivery of the vote message (full copy below), I'm extending the vote
period for another 72 hours.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Tommaso
2014-05-11 21:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Dürig :
>
>
> On 9.5.14 4:07 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>>
>> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
>>
>
> Michael
>
>[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
kind regards
angela
+1
greets
claus
P.S Good Work !!!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. Mai 2014 22:23
An: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache
Hi,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Parvu
Hi,
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the
> jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deployments?
Not yet. You can use either the Jackrabbit users list or this mailing
list for Oak-related questions.
BR,
Ju
On 19.5.14 10:17 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the
jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deployments?
Not yet. You can use either the Jackrabbit users list or this mailin
fine with me
On 19/05/14 10:41, "Michael Dürig" wrote:
>
>
>On 19.5.14 10:17 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Torgeir Veimo
>> wrote:
>>> Is there to be an oak-user mailing list, or should one use the
>>> jackrabbit users mailing list for discussion on deploym
17 matches
Mail list logo