Hi,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Chetan Mehrotra
wrote:
> Currently we are having following interfaces as part of exported
> packages [2]. Looking at the list I believe most are of ProviderType
> i.e. provided by Oak and not required by Oak API users.
Not really. Almost all of the interfaces
+1, not sure whether we have enough resources to do this in time for 1.0
though. Maybe we could do it where obvious?
Michael
On 24.4.14 10:48 , Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
As part of OAK-1741 I was changing the Version of exported packages to
1.0.0. Looking at the interfaces which are part of exp
As part of OAK-1741 I was changing the Version of exported packages to
1.0.0. Looking at the interfaces which are part of exported packages I
do not see usage of ConsumerType/ProviderType annotations [1]
In brief and simple terms the interfaces which are expected to be
implemented by users of Oak