Re: Backport OAK-7998 to 1.10.3

2019-07-18 Thread Matt Ryan
Ah yes, I think that was a typo. Thanks Julian. On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:14 AM Julian Reschke wrote: > On 18.07.2019 02:06, Matt Ryan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose to backport the fix for OAK-7998 to 1.10.3. > > > > The issue in OAK-7998 is that it is possible to obtain a direct download >

Re: Backport OAK-7998 to 1.10.3

2019-07-18 Thread Julian Reschke
On 18.07.2019 02:06, Matt Ryan wrote: Hi, I propose to backport the fix for OAK-7998 to 1.10.3. The issue in OAK-7998 is that it is possible to obtain a direct download URI for a binary that doesn't exist in blob storage. While not usually possible, this situation can arise if the binary in qu

Backport OAK-7998 to 1.10.3

2019-07-17 Thread Matt Ryan
Hi, I propose to backport the fix for OAK-7998 to 1.10.3. The issue in OAK-7998 is that it is possible to obtain a direct download URI for a binary that doesn't exist in blob storage. While not usually possible, this situation can arise if the binary in question was added via addRecord() and the