HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?

Hi, I recently talked to someone who might be interested in reviving the OAK-784 HBase microkernel that was contributed in April 2013. That's based on the MicroKernel interface, is that still how you'd do it today? I've lost track of the various ways of creating storage backends. -Bertrand

Re: HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?

Hi, it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak, but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API: - SegmentNodeStore aka TarMK - DocumentNodeStore aka MongoMK both implementations have again their own storage abstraction, which means the

Re: HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?

Hi Marcel, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote: ...it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak, but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API... Thanks! I have added a reference to this to OAK-784. -Bertrand

Re: HBase backend, is the OAK-784 still valid?

On 2014-07-03 10:12, Marcel Reutegger wrote: Hi, it is still possible to hook in a MicroKernel implementation into Oak, but the two primary implementations we have use the NodeStore API: - SegmentNodeStore aka TarMK - DocumentNodeStore aka MongoMK both implementations have again their own