be listed as "Experimental" at some point?
Thanks,
Domenic
-Original Message-
From: Marcel Reutegger [mailto:mreut...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:14 AM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org<mailto:oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 2.10 vs Oak 1.2.7
Hi D
y time you have to review.
>> >
>> >https://github.com/Domenic-Ansys/Jackrabbit2-Oak-Tests
>> >
>> >As you stated the move is a non goal, but in comparison to Jackrabbit 2 I
>> >am also finding in my tests that create, update, and copy are all faster
>> >
be listed as "Experimental" at some point?
>
>Thanks,
>Domenic
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Marcel Reutegger [mailto:mreut...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:14 AM
>To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 2.10 vs Oak 1.2.7
31, 2016 6:14 AM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 2.10 vs Oak 1.2.7
Hi Domenic,
On 30/03/16 14:34, "Domenic DiTano" wrote:
>"In contrast to Jackrabbit 2, a move of a large subtree is an expensive
>operation in Oak"
>So should I avoid doing a mo
Hi Domenic,
On 30/03/16 14:34, "Domenic DiTano" wrote:
>"In contrast to Jackrabbit 2, a move of a large subtree is an expensive
>operation in Oak"
>So should I avoid doing a move of a large number of items using Oak? If
>we
>are using Oak then should we avoid operations with a large number of
end-start;
}
Thanks,
Domenic
-Original Message-
From: Marcel Reutegger [mailto:mreut...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:42 AM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 2.10 vs Oak 1.2.7
Hi,
On 29/03/16 14:55, "Domenic DiTano" wrote:
>Sending the
inal Message-
From: Marcel Reutegger [mailto:mreut...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 4:41 AM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 2.10 vs Oak 1.2.7
Hi,
the graphs didn't make it through to the mailing list.
Can you please post raw numbers or a link to the grap
Hi,
the graphs didn't make it through to the mailing list.
Can you please post raw numbers or a link to the graphs?
Without access to more data, my guess is that Oak on
DocumentNodeStore is slower with the bigger changes set
because it internally creates a branch to stage changes
when it reaches
Hello,
I work with web application that has Jackrabbit 2.10 embedded and we wanted
to try upgrading to Oak. Our current configuration that we use for
Jackrabbit 2.10 is the FileDataStore along with MySql for the Persistence
DataStore. We wrote some test cases to measure the performance of
