On 10/7/14, 11:27 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 7.10.14 10:30 , Tommaso Teofili wrote:
2014-10-07 18:15 GMT+02:00 Rob Ryan rr...@adobe.com:
I'm not so sure about the conclusion that because the events of
interest
are local you can safely use userData. IIUC under heavy
On 8.10.14 10:46 , Marius Petria wrote:
But is it guaranteed that all events dispatched as local events have the
user data filled if available?
Yes. In fact if you access the user data without first checking whether
the event is local (JackrabbitEvent.isExternal) Oak will log a warning:
Hi Michael,
thanks for the information, despite the given limitations I think it could
still work for my use case, as the distinction I need to make by means of
userData should always be on local events.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-10-03 17:10 GMT+02:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org:
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 2:32 AM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: ObservationManager's userData in Oak
Hi Michael,
thanks for the information, despite the given limitations I think it could
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: ObservationManager's userData in Oak
Hi Michael,
thanks for the information, despite the given limitations I think it could
still work for my use case, as the distinction I need to make by means of
userData should always be on local events.
Regards
, October 07, 2014 2:32 AM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: ObservationManager's userData in Oak
Hi Michael,
thanks for the information, despite the given limitations I think it could
still work for my use case, as the distinction I need to make by means of
userData should always
Hi Tommaso,
Unfortunately Oak has only limited support for user data as it cannot
preserve commit boundaries in all cases (e.g. commits from other cluster
nodes). See also
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/differences.html#Observation
Michael
On 3.10.14 5:00 , Tommaso Teofili wrote:
