Re: backport OAK-4153 to 1.0/1.2/1.4

2016-08-18 Thread Michael Dürig
+1. I think this is reasonably safe and the benefits are worth it. Michael On 18.8.16 4:22 , Stefan Egli wrote: Hi, OAK-4153 has been in trunk for a while and I thought it would be good to have this in other branches too. Therefore a quick poll, are we OK to backport this to all branches (1.0

Re: backport OAK-4153 to 1.0/1.2/1.4

2016-08-18 Thread Vikas Saurabh
> are we OK to > backport this to all branches (1.0/1.2/1.4)? +1 for all branches mainly because side-effects arising out of OAK-4153 would be very hard to investigate/reason-about. On the same lines, keeping track of such difference in behavior across branch is hard. > Cheers, > Stefan > -- > ht

backport OAK-4153 to 1.0/1.2/1.4

2016-08-18 Thread Stefan Egli
Hi, OAK-4153 has been in trunk for a while and I thought it would be good to have this in other branches too. Therefore a quick poll, are we OK to backport this to all branches (1.0/1.2/1.4)? Cheers, Stefan -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4153