Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
> On 30.7.13 16:24, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> The user already knows the settings as they're the one providing the
>> information (or using the default).
>
> He knows what he passed in. That might be different from what is being
> applied. S
On 30.7.13 16:24, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 30.7.13 16:09, Jukka Zitting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:56 PM, wrote:
+log.info();
These should become log.debug(...) as soon as the code stabilizes.
I don't
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
> On 30.7.13 16:09, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:56 PM, wrote:
>>> +log.info();
>>
>> These should become log.debug(...) as soon as the code stabilizes.
>
> I don't agree. As long as this is user
On 30.7.13 16:09, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:56 PM, wrote:
+log.info();
These should become log.debug(...) as soon as the code stabilizes.
I don't agree. As long as this is user configurable we should make that
information available in the lo
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:56 PM, wrote:
> +log.info();
These should become log.debug(...) as soon as the code stabilizes.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
